82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18372460)
21. Characterizing the performance of diagnostic imaging systems.
Lopez H
Acad Radiol; 1995 Jul; 2(7):634-7. PubMed ID: 9419616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [VII: Diagnostic trials: Simple measures of validity and reliability].
Krummenauer F
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Apr; 220(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 12695973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Realities of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice: a case for non-invasive indirect methodologies.
Metz DC; Furth EE; Faigel DO; Kroser JA; Alavi A; Barrett DM; Montone K
Yale J Biol Med; 1998; 71(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 10378353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it.
Thornbury JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8273645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of new diagnostic technologies: bronchoalveolar lavage and the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Cook DJ; Brun-Buisson C; Guyatt GH; Sibbald WJ
Crit Care Med; 1994 Aug; 22(8):1314-22. PubMed ID: 8045152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laser scanning imaging for macular disease: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
McDonald HR; Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus DM; ;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1221-8. PubMed ID: 17466377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized controlled trials are not appropriate for imaging technology evaluation.
Valk PE
J Nucl Med; 2000 Jul; 41(7):1125-6. PubMed ID: 10914899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
Burgess AE
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [BVC (bias to variance characteristic) analysis].
Matsumoto T
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Dec; 34(13):1539-47. PubMed ID: 2622045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of restricted ROC surfaces in three-class classification tasks.
Edwards DC; Metz CE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1345-56. PubMed ID: 17948725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. If you have it, you use it. Latest Blues association study finds new technology not only drives demand but also increases spending.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):9, 11. PubMed ID: 14666544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients.
Greenes RA; Begg CB
Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):751-6. PubMed ID: 3835974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [A methodology study on assessment of cancer screening test].
Gao GF; Zhao FH; Wu YP; Rong SD; Zhang WH; Pan QJ; Li L; Qiao YL
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 24(6):573-6. PubMed ID: 12905682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Determinants of observer variability in early diagnostic mammography--a ROC analysis].
Swart E; Robra BP; Dierks ML; Reinerth H; Frischbier HJ; Bahnsen J; Schreer I; Hoeffken W
Rofo; 1993 Aug; 159(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 8353267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.
Hunink MG; Krestin GP
Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 11867773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interpretation of diagnostic tests: diagnostic accuracy efficacy and effectiveness.
Stolberg HO; Nahmias C; Trop I
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2003 Feb; 54(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12625079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Introduction: health technology assessment in diagnostic imaging.
Carlos RC; Goeree R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):297-8. PubMed ID: 19394569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [ROC curves in the evaluation of diagnostic tests].
Burgueño MJ; García-Bastos JL; González-Buitrago JM
Med Clin (Barc); 1995 May; 104(17):661-70. PubMed ID: 7623495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
