These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18372750)

  • 1. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 21910520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.
    Ulrich R; Vorberg D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1219-27. PubMed ID: 19633337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: routines for MATLAB and R.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Vorberg D; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1157-74. PubMed ID: 22773433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model.
    Ulrich R; Nitschke J; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1140-52. PubMed ID: 17355038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability.
    Jogan M; Stocker AA
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):20. PubMed ID: 24627460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal judgments in multi-sensory space.
    Retsa C; Naish P; Bekinschtein T; Bak TH
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():101-112. PubMed ID: 26898372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination sensitivity for short and long durations.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1033-43. PubMed ID: 25832187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.
    Hellström A
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1305-17. PubMed ID: 9865072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociation between perception and visuomotor transformation during reproduction of remembered distances.
    Gentilucci M; Negrotti A
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Oct; 72(4):2026-30. PubMed ID: 7823116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-order errors and standard-position effects in duration discrimination: An experimental study and an analysis by the sensation-weighting model.
    Hellström Å; Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2409-23. PubMed ID: 26082151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anchoring in time estimation.
    Thomas KE; Handley SJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 17276378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.