These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1837295)

  • 1. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms.
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 1837295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The control of stimulus-driven saccades is subject not to central, but to visual attention limitations.
    Carbone E; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2168-75. PubMed ID: 21097860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.
    Joseph JS; Optican LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):651-65. PubMed ID: 8710445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation.
    Dell'Acqua R; Turatto M; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):777-89. PubMed ID: 11521846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors.
    Schmidt F; Schmidt T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loci of signal probability effects and of the attentional blink bottleneck.
    Crebolder JM; Jolicoeur P; McIlwaine JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):695-716. PubMed ID: 12075897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
    Scharlau I
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is evidence for late selection due to automatic or attentional processing of stimulus identities?
    Fournier LR; Shorter S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):991-1003. PubMed ID: 11578060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does perceptual analysis continue during selection and production of a speeded response?
    Levy J; Pashler H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):245-60. PubMed ID: 8525873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?
    Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between time of arrival of nontargets and their spatial location: evidence for asymmetries in visual attentional processing.
    Coyle K
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):849-56. PubMed ID: 7845774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):826-42. PubMed ID: 2148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.