These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1837295)

  • 41. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment.
    Neumann O; Esselmann U; Klotz W
    Psychol Res; 1993; 56(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 8310102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
    Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.
    Griffiths G; Herwig A; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 23757511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.
    Fagot C; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1058-79. PubMed ID: 1431744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task.
    Mounts JR; Melara RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nonautomatic emotion perception in a dual-task situation.
    Tomasik D; Ruthruff E; Allen PA; Lien MC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 19293095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of masked repetition priming and orthographic neighborhood in visual recognition of words.
    Perea M; Gotor A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 8873189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Shift and deviate: Saccades reveal that shifts of covert attention evoked by trained spatial stimuli are obligatory.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20601705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attentional resource allocation during a cued saccade task.
    Huddleston WE; Aleksandrowicz MS; Yufa A; Knurr CR; Lytle JR; Puissant MM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 23792667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance.
    Halvorson KM; Ebner H; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):413-32. PubMed ID: 22866763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.
    Reinitz MT
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 2349062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.
    Turatto M; Galfano G
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):286-97. PubMed ID: 11281103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of contrast polarity in paracontrast masking.
    Kafaligönül H; Breitmeyer BG; Ogmen H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1576-87. PubMed ID: 19801617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Location dominance in attending to color and shape.
    Tsal Y; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8440981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.
    Franconeri SL; Simons DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):999-1010. PubMed ID: 14674628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.