These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement? Ruthruff E; Pashler HE; Klaassen A Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11340869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Sequential effects in rudimentary auditory and visual tasks. Quinlan PT; Hill NI Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 10089767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Taylor TL; Donnelly MP Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue. Lyon DR Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Feb; 73(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 2316388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Inhibition of return to occluded objects. Yi DJ; Kim MS; Chun MM Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1222-30. PubMed ID: 14710957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks? Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Early perceptual interactions shape the time course of cueing. Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 23743344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. Hommuk K; Bachmann T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. How does target duration affect object substitution masking? Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex. Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Evidence for attentional processing in spatial localization. Adam JJ; Davelaar EJ; van der Gouw A; Willems P Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):433-42. PubMed ID: 17899176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink. Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Selective effect of closed-head injury on central resource allocation: evidence from dual-task performance. Dell'Acqua R; Stablum F; Galbiati S; Spannocchi G; Cerri C Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(3):364-78. PubMed ID: 11243478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task. Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E; Khan M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1435-52. PubMed ID: 21479723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]