These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1837302)

  • 1. Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration.
    Cohen A; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):891-901. PubMed ID: 1837302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.
    Cohen A; Ivry R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):650-63. PubMed ID: 2531202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.
    Treisman A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):652-76. PubMed ID: 1834783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual feature integration with an attention deficit.
    Arguin M; Cavanagh P; Joanette Y
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 8123263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
    Wolfe JM; Cave KR; Franzel SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 2527952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminability and dimensionality effects in visual search for featural conjunctions: a functional pop-out.
    Dehaene S
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2755764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions.
    Ivry RB; Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Feb; 49(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 2017349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets.
    Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):775-97. PubMed ID: 8409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.
    Ashby FG; Prinzmetal W; Ivry R; Maddox WT
    Psychol Rev; 1996 Jan; 103(1):165-92. PubMed ID: 8650297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conjunction search revisited.
    Treisman A; Sato S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):459-78. PubMed ID: 2144564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets.
    Ward R; McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):664-72. PubMed ID: 2531203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?
    Shih SI; Sperling G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):758-79. PubMed ID: 8666962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.
    Briand KA; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.
    Johnston JC; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response effects in the perception of conjunctions of colour and form.
    Chmiel N
    Psychol Res; 1989; 51(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 2608863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underestimating numerosity of items in visual search tasks.
    Cassenti DN; Kelley TD; Ghirardelli TG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 21162441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity effects in visual search predicted from the group scanning model.
    Macquistan AD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Dec; 48(4):495-515. PubMed ID: 7866391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens.
    Kanwisher N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):404-21. PubMed ID: 1830084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.
    Carrasco M; Yeshurun Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):673-92. PubMed ID: 9554103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerosity underestimation with item similarity in dynamic visual display.
    Au RK; Watanabe K
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23820026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.