These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1837305)

  • 1. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors.
    Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan?
    Johnson NF; Carnot MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.
    Humphreys GW; Mayall K; Cooper AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 15000542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tilted letters and tilted words: a possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition.
    Driver J; Baylis GC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 7476242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repetition blindness for words yet repetition advantage for nonwords.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 12696808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.
    Reber R; Zimmermann TD; Wurtz P
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 15751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On non-adjacent letter repetition and orthographic processing: Lexical decisions to nonwords created by repeating or inserting letters in words.
    Kerr E; Mirault J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):596-609. PubMed ID: 33236286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.
    McCann RS; Folk CL; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1015-29. PubMed ID: 1431741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting effects of letter-spacing in alexia: further evidence that different strategies generate word length effects in reading.
    Price CJ; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Aug; 48(3):573-97. PubMed ID: 7568992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target.
    Burt JS; Jolley J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 28646419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual grouping in visual word recognition.
    Bock JM; Monk AF; Hulme C
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 8433651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):924-41. PubMed ID: 1837304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are whole words perceptual units in reading?
    Silverman WP; Ulatowski PE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):811-26. PubMed ID: 7322780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.