414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18373857)
1. How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.
Coleman CH; Bouësseau MC
BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18373857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current status of the research ethics committees in Thailand.
Panichkul S; Mahaisavariya P; Morakote N; Condo S; Caengow S; Ketunpanya A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 21863687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.
Koepsell D; Brinkman WP; Pont S
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):1033-48. PubMed ID: 24938695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disclosing conflicts of interest in clinical research: views of institutional review boards, conflict of interest committees, and investigators.
Weinfurt KP; Friedman JY; Dinan MA; Allsbrook JS; Hall MA; Dhillon JK; Sugarman J
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(3):581-91, 481. PubMed ID: 17144182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
Dyck M; Allen G
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees.
Fritschi L; Kelsall HL; Loff B; Slegers C; Zion D; Glass DC
J Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 41(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 25605609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Putting the "ethics" into "research ethics".
Spike J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):51-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.
Greco D; Diniz NM
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. PubMed ID: 18664007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Quality of Research Ethics Review and Oversight: A Systematic Analysis of Quality Assessment Instruments.
Lynch HF; Abdirisak M; Bogia M; Clapp J
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(4):208-222. PubMed ID: 32821021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic.
Alirol E; Kuesel AC; Guraiib MM; de la Fuente-Núñez V; Saxena A; Gomes MF
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 28651650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overall Assessment of Human Research and Ethics Committees in the United Arab Emirates.
Abdulrahman M; Nair SC
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Apr; 12(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 28421889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics review procedures for research in developing countries: a basic presumption of guilt.
Gilman RH; Garcia HH
CMAJ; 2004 Aug; 171(3):248-9. PubMed ID: 15289424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Inclusion Benefits in Ethics Committee Assessment of Research Studies.
Rennie S; Day S; Mathews A; Gilbertson A; Luseno WK; Tucker JD; Henderson GE
Ethics Hum Res; 2019 May; 41(3):13-22. PubMed ID: 31108576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IOM report on the system for protecting human research participants.
Beauchamp TL
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2002 Dec; 12(4):389-90. PubMed ID: 12645614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The limits of disclosure: what research subjects want to know about investigator financial interests.
Grady C; Horstmann E; Sussman JS; Hull SC
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(3):592-9, 481. PubMed ID: 17144183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Exploration of the Protective Effects of Investigators' Ethical Awareness upon Subjects of Drug Clinical Trials in China.
Zhang L; Huang XX; Chen HF
J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 29230696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
