These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18373857)

  • 21. Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada.
    Rwabihama JP; Girre C; Duguet AM
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 20338938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation.
    Cho MK; Tobin SL; Greely HT; McCormick J; Boyce A; Magnus D
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Mar; 8(3):4-13. PubMed ID: 18570086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The job of 'ethics committees'.
    Moore A; Donnelly A
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):481-487. PubMed ID: 26566944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
    Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.
    Macpherson CC
    Dev World Bioeth; 2001 May; 1(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 12870511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Readiness of ethics review systems for a changing public health landscape in the WHO African Region.
    Motari M; Ota MO; Kirigia JM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 16(1):82. PubMed ID: 26626131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
    Dunn M
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):527-8. PubMed ID: 23118467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Establishment of ethical oversight of human research in El Salvador: lessons learned.
    Caniza MA; Clara W; Maron G; Navarro-Marin JE; Rivera R; Howard SC; Camp J; Barfield RC
    Lancet Oncol; 2006 Dec; 7(12):1027-33. PubMed ID: 17138224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Study participants incentives, compensation and reimbursement in resource-constrained settings.
    Mduluza T; Midzi N; Duruza D; Ndebele P
    BMC Med Ethics; 2013; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 24564948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Ethics review committees for human research: the challenge of strengthening this process in Colombia].
    Miranda MC; Palma GI; Jaramillo E
    Biomedica; 2006 Mar; 26(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 16929911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Institutional Review Boards: What Clinician Researchers Need to Know.
    Lapid MI; Clarke BL; Wright RS
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Mar; 94(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 30832791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of recent regulatory notifications on an institutional ethics committee.
    Bhide SS; Jalgaonkar SV; Katkar JV; Shetty YC; Tripathi RK; Marathe PA; Thatte UM
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(4):210-214. PubMed ID: 27473067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How not to argue against mandatory ethics review.
    Hunter D
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):521-4. PubMed ID: 23236085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Research ethics committees in Japan: A perspective from thirty years of experience at Tokushima University.
    Yanagawa H; Katashima R; Takeda N
    J Med Invest; 2015; 62(3-4):114-8. PubMed ID: 26399332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks.
    Aarons D
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):343-346. PubMed ID: 30511771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.
    Di Tillio-Gonzalez D; Fischbach RL
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17488491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Research, ethics and conflicts of interest.
    Little M
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 10390683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical review of research on human subjects at Unilever: reflections on governance.
    Sheehan M; Marti V; Roberts T
    Bioethics; 2014 Jul; 28(6):284-92. PubMed ID: 23841908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review.
    Israel M
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):525-6. PubMed ID: 23033478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.