BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18375281)

  • 1. Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study.
    Zehms CT; Whiddon DR; Miller MD; Quinby JS; Montgomery SL; Campbell RB; Sekiya JK
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):472-80. PubMed ID: 18375281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
    Cooper DE; Stewart D
    Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double compared with single-bundle open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaver model.
    Whiddon DR; Zehms CT; Miller MD; Quinby JS; Montgomery SL; Sekiya JK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1820-9. PubMed ID: 18762640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
    Fanelli GC; Edson CJ
    Arthroscopy; 2002 Sep; 18(7):703-14. PubMed ID: 12209427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with Achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tendon tenodesis: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
    Fanelli GC; Edson CJ
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Apr; 20(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 15067271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
    Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Comparison: Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.
    Milles JL; Nuelle CW; Pfeiffer F; Stannard JP; Smith P; Kfuri M; Cook JL
    J Knee Surg; 2017 May; 30(4):347-351. PubMed ID: 27543681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of laxity in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency: comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with modified Larson posterolateral corner reconstruction.
    Apsingi S; Nguyen T; Bull AM; Unwin A; Deehan DJ; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Mar; 36(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 18230868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Graft Tensioning Sequence on Tibiofemoral Orientation During Bicruciate and Posterolateral Corner Knee Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.
    Moatshe G; Chahla J; Brady AW; Dornan GJ; Muckenhirn KJ; Kruckeberg BM; Cinque ME; Turnbull TL; Engebretsen L; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 46(8):1863-1869. PubMed ID: 29953291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.
    Shon OJ; Lee DC; Park CH; Kim WH; Jung KA
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 20514264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.
    Zhang J; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Zheng T; Li Y
    Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():18-25. PubMed ID: 33813104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique.
    Kim SJ; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kung YP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():145-57. PubMed ID: 20844171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.
    Nuelle CW; Milles JL; Pfeiffer FM; Stannard JP; Smith PA; Kfuri M; Cook JL
    J Knee Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):523-531. PubMed ID: 27780285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinically relevant assessment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries. Evaluation of isolated and combined deficiency.
    Sekiya JK; Whiddon DR; Zehms CT; Miller MD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1621-7. PubMed ID: 18676890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How well do anatomical reconstructions of the posterolateral corner restore varus stability to the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee?
    Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1117-22. PubMed ID: 17581975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with aperture femoral fixation.
    Mutnal A; Leo BM; Vargas L; Colbrunn RW; Butler RS; Uribe JW
    Orthopedics; 2015 Jan; 38(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 25611406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces.
    Margheritini F; Mauro CS; Rihn JA; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15090372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: a comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction.
    Wijdicks CA; Kennedy NI; Goldsmith MT; Devitt BM; Michalski MP; Årøen A; Engebretsen L; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2839-48. PubMed ID: 24092043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury.
    Jung YB; Jung HJ; Tae SK; Lee YS; Yang DL
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16517318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces.
    Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 12063327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.