These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18375457)
1. Revisiting Youden's index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Böhning D; Böhning W; Holling H Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 18375457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation. Hajian-Tilaki K Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2374-2383. PubMed ID: 28673124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Youden's index and the weight of evidence. Hughes G Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 25658987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal-threshold determination in shared decision making. Lin S; Ma Y; Zou H J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 31738475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Youden's Index and the Weight of Evidence Revisited. Hughes G Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(6):576-7. PubMed ID: 26548463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication. Sharifabadi AD; Korevaar DA; McGrath TA; van Es N; Frank RA; Cherpak L; Dang W; Salameh JP; Nguyen F; Stanley C; McInnes MDF Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3632-3639. PubMed ID: 29564596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Zhou Y; Dendukuri N Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2701-17. PubMed ID: 24903142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple nonparametric confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests. Adimari G; Chiogna M Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 24. PubMed ID: 21969980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index. Hilden J; Glasziou P Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):969-86. PubMed ID: 8783436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The partial area under the summary ROC curve. Walter SD Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tjur's R Hughes G Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):801-802. PubMed ID: 29108818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Youden's Index and the Likelihood Ratio Positive in Diagnostic Testing. Böhning D Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(4):382-3. PubMed ID: 26063628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection. Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data. Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios. Biggerstaff BJ Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibody against Brucella abortus in cattle sera using an automated ELISA workstation. Paweska JT; Potts AD; Harris HJ; Smith SJ; Viljoen GJ; Dungu B; Brett OL; Bubb M; Prozesky L Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 2002 Mar; 69(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 12092779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique. Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous measurements of serum alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K absence for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma. South Tohoku District Study Group. Ishii M; Gama H; Chida N; Ueno Y; Shinzawa H; Takagi T; Toyota T; Takahashi T; Kasukawa R Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 10763956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A limitation of the diagnostic-odds ratio in determining an optimal cut-off value for a continuous diagnostic test. Böhning D; Holling H; Patilea V Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Oct; 20(5):541-50. PubMed ID: 20639268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeated-measures modeling improved comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis of dependent studies. Siadaty MS; Philbrick JT; Heim SW; Schectman JM J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 15358397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]