These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1837555)

  • 1. Therapeutic strategies in tubal infertility with distal pathology.
    Audibert F; Hédon B; Arnal F; Humeau C; Boulot P; Bachelard B; Benos P; Laffargue F; Viala JL
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Nov; 6(10):1439-42. PubMed ID: 1837555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proximal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus IVF--a review.
    Marana R; Quagliarello J
    Int J Fertil; 1988; 33(5):338-40. PubMed ID: 2904421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus in vitro fertilization--a review.
    Marana R; Quagliarello J
    Int J Fertil; 1988; 33(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 2898447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility.
    Watson A; Vandekerckhove P; Lilford R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000221. PubMed ID: 10796702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The risk of ectopic pregnancy following tubal reconstructive microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology procedures.
    Schippert C; Soergel P; Staboulidou I; Bassler C; Gagalick S; Hillemanns P; Buehler K; Garcia-Rocha GJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 21947340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy.
    Sagoskin AW; Lessey BA; Mottla GL; Richter KS; Chetkowski RJ; Chang AS; Levy MJ; Stillman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2634-7. PubMed ID: 14645184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation of infertility treatment for tubal disease.
    Granberg M; Strandell A; Thorburn J; Daya S; Wikland M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2003 Aug; 20(8):301-8. PubMed ID: 12948091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microsurgery for tubal infertility.
    Gomel V; McComb PF
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Mar; 51(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 16674012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to treat hydrosalpinges: IVF as the treatment of choice.
    Strandell A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2002; 4 Suppl 3():37-9. PubMed ID: 12470563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the ongoing pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilisation following tubal occlusion by microcoil placement versus laparoscopic tubal ligation for hydrosalpinges.
    Chen ZQ; Ng EHY; Chen MX; Zhao M; Pan JP; Chen H; Teng XM
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2022 Feb; 25(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 31833424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].
    Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery].
    Korell M; Strowitzki T; Hepp H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 8585362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of salpingectomy on the results of IVF in women with tubal sterility--prospective study].
    Mardesić T; Muller P; Huttelová R; Zvárová J; Hulvert J; Voboril J; Becvárová V; Miková M; Landová K; Jirkovský M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2001 Jul; 66(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11569422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance.
    Dubuisson JB; Chapron C; Morice P; Aubriot FX; Foulot H; Bouquet de Jolinière J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Feb; 9(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 8027292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy].
    Eyraud B; Erny R; Vergnet F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8463574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysteroscopic tubal electrocoagulation versus laparoscopic tubal ligation for patients with hydrosalpinges undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    El-Mazny A; Abou-Salem N; Hammam M; Saber W
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 130(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 26140948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
    Winston RM; Margara RA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges.
    Gelbaya TA; Nardo LG; Fitzgerald CT; Horne G; Brison DR; Lieberman BA
    Fertil Steril; 2006 May; 85(5):1464-8. PubMed ID: 16580673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Therapeutic strategy in tubal infertility.
    Audibert F
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 734():460-8. PubMed ID: 7978949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated.
    Mossa B; Patella A; Ebano V; Pacifici E; Mossa S; Marziani R
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2005; 32(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 16433156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.