BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18375647)

  • 41. An exact method for analysis following a two-stage phase II cancer clinical trial.
    Jovic G; Whitehead J
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3118-25. PubMed ID: 21170906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analysis of phase II methodologies for single-arm clinical trials with multiple endpoints in rare cancers: An example in Ewing's sarcoma.
    Dutton P; Love SB; Billingham L; Hassan AB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1451-1463. PubMed ID: 27587590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Applications of Bayesian statistical methodology to clinical trial design: A case study of a phase 2 trial with an interim futility assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
    Smith CL; Jin Y; Raddad E; McNearney TA; Ni X; Monteith D; Brown R; Deeg MA; Schnitzer T
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 30321909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Optimal Sequential Predictive Probability Designs for Early-Phase Oncology Expansion Cohorts.
    Zabor EC; Kaizer AM; Garrett-Mayer E; Hobbs BP
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2022 Mar; 6():e2100390. PubMed ID: 35385345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Monitoring futility and efficacy in phase II trials with Bayesian posterior distributions-A calibration approach.
    Kopp-Schneider A; Wiesenfarth M; Witt R; Edelmann D; Witt O; Abel U
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 30175405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Phase II cancer clinical trials with heterogeneous patient populations.
    Jung SH; Chang MN; Kang SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):312-28. PubMed ID: 22251176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A randomized Bayesian optimal phase II design with binary endpoint.
    Ding Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Mar; 33(2):151-166. PubMed ID: 35793222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Englert S; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2013 Nov; 55(6):955-68. PubMed ID: 23868324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Bayesian Hybrid Adaptive Randomisation Design for Clinical Trials with Survival Outcomes.
    Moatti M; Chevret S; Zohar S; Rosenberger WF
    Methods Inf Med; 2016; 55(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 26404511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Minimizing the maximum expected sample size in two-stage Phase II clinical trials with continuous outcomes.
    Wason JM; Mander AP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):836-52. PubMed ID: 22651118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Bayesian decision-theoretic sequential response-adaptive randomization design.
    Jiang F; Jack Lee J; Müller P
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):1975-94. PubMed ID: 23315678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A method for utilizing co-primary efficacy outcome measures to screen regimens for activity in two-stage Phase II clinical trials.
    Sill MW; Rubinstein L; Litwin S; Yothers G
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 22811448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimal flexible designs in phase II clinical trials.
    Chen TT; Ng TH
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(20):2301-12. PubMed ID: 9819829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Two-stage designs optimal under the alternative hypothesis for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Mander AP; Thompson SG
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 20678585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. TOP: Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Phase II Trial Design for Cancer Immunotherapy.
    Lin R; Coleman RL; Yuan Y
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 Jan; 112(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 30924863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Sargent DJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):802-16. PubMed ID: 24697589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Bayesian adaptive dose selection procedure with an overdispersed count endpoint.
    Pozzi L; Schmidli H; Gasparini M; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):5008-27. PubMed ID: 24022748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.