These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18376533)

  • 1. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 2. Airborne pollutants.
    Banhazi TM; Seedorf J; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 18376533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 4. Emission factors and study recommendations.
    Banhazi TM; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18376535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 1. Study justification and design.
    Banhazi TM; Seedorf J; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18376532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 3. Environmental parameters.
    Banhazi TM; Seedorf J; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 18376534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Gestation Pens Versus Stalls and Wet Versus Dry Feed on Air Contaminants in Swine Production.
    Raynor PC; Engelman S; Murphy D; Ramachandran G; Bender JB; Alexander BH
    J Agromedicine; 2018; 23(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 28976266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Major environmental characteristics of swine husbandry that affect exposure to dust and airborne endotoxins.
    Shin SJ; Song ES; Kim JW; Lee JH; Gautam R; Kim HJ; Kim YG; Cho AR; Yang SJ; Acharya M; Kim CY; Lee BC; Kim CH; Oh HG; Kwag JH; Yoon DH; Kim HA; Heo Y
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(4):233-243. PubMed ID: 30821635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exposure assessment of airborne contaminants in the indoor environment of Irish swine farms.
    Mc Donnell PE; Coggins MA; Hogan VJ; Fleming GT
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 19061270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Korean farmer's exposure level to dust in pig buildings.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim YS; Kim CN
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 18581979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses.
    Chang CW; Chung H; Huang CF; Su HJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Aug; 45(6):457-65. PubMed ID: 11513795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.
    Duchaine C; Grimard Y; Cormier Y
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10772615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Nature and amount of aerial pollutants from livestock buildings].
    Hartung J
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Jun; 105(6):213-6. PubMed ID: 9693454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal and spatial distributions of aerial contaminants in an enclosed pig building in winter.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Lee KJ; Park JB; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 16194664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ventilation rate on gradient of aerial contaminants in the confinement pig building.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim YS; Roh YM; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2007 Mar; 103(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17184767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of particles, ammonia and endotoxin in swine confinement operations.
    Pickrell JA; Heber AJ; Murphy JP; Henry SC; May MM; Nolan D; Oehme FW; Gillespie JR; Schoneweis D
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1993 Oct; 35(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 8249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal variation of indoor air quality in an enclosed swine confinement building.
    O'Shaughnessy PT; Achutan C; Karsten AW
    J Agric Saf Health; 2002 Nov; 8(4):349-64. PubMed ID: 12549241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indoor environmental quality in six commercial office buildings in the midwest United States.
    Reynolds SJ; Black DW; Borin SS; Breuer G; Burmeister LF; Fuortes LJ; Smith TF; Stein MA; Subramanian P; Thorne PS; Whitten P
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Nov; 16(11):1065-77. PubMed ID: 11757903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endotoxin concentration in modern animal houses in southern Bavaria.
    Schierl R; Heise A; Egger U; Schneider F; Eichelser R; Neser S; Nowak D
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2007; 14(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 17655190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concentrations of airborne culturable bacteria in 100 large US office buildings from the BASE study.
    Tsai FC; Macher JM
    Indoor Air; 2005; 15 Suppl 9():71-81. PubMed ID: 15910532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organic dust exposures from work in dairy barns.
    Kullman GJ; Thorne PS; Waldron PF; Marx JJ; Ault B; Lewis DM; Siegel PD; Olenchock SA; Merchant JA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Jun; 59(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 9670470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endotoxin concentration in poultry houses for laying hens kept in cages or in alternative housing systems.
    Huneau-Salaün A; Le Bouquin S; Bex-Capelle V; Huonnic D; Balaine L; Guillam MT; Squizani F; Segala C; Michel V
    Br Poult Sci; 2011 Oct; 52(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 22029777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.