405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18377167)
1. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
Waller D; Richardson AR
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users.
Higuchi T; Takada H; Matsuura Y; Imanaka K
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15053702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of spatial integration in the perception of surface orientation with active touch.
Giachritsis CD; Wing AM; Lovell PG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1628-40. PubMed ID: 19801622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users' distance estimates.
Richardson AR; Waller D
Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):507-17. PubMed ID: 17552313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judging the 'passability' of dynamic gaps in a virtual rugby environment.
Watson G; Brault S; Kulpa R; Bideau B; Butterfield J; Craig C
Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Oct; 30(5):942-56. PubMed ID: 20952081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques.
Steinicke F; Bruder G; Jerald J; Frenz H; Lappe M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19910658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distance underestimation in virtual space is sensitive to gender but not activity-passivity or mode of interaction.
Foreman N; Sandamas G; Newson D
Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Aug; 7(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15331032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-training of dynamic touch: striking improves judgment by wielding.
Stephen DG; Arzamarski R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1717-23. PubMed ID: 19933557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Braking reaching movements: a test of the constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions.
Hopkins B; Churchill A; Vogt S; Rönnqvist L
J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 14766484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
Hodgson E; Waller D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the mechanisms underlying improved distance judgments in virtual environments.
Kunz BR; Creem-Regehr SH
Perception; 2015; 44(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 26492729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments.
Farrell MJ; Arnold P; Pettifer S; Adams J; Graham T; MacManamon M
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Dec; 9(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 14664673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality.
Swan JE; Jones A; Kolstad E; Livingston MA; Smallman HS
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 17356211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optic variables used to judge future ball arrival position in expert and novice soccer players.
Craig CM; Goulon C; Berton E; Rao G; Fernandez L; Bootsma RJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 19304642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First-perspective alignment effects in a computer-simulated environment.
Wilson PN; Wildbur DJ
Br J Psychol; 2004 May; 95(Pt 2):197-217. PubMed ID: 15142302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pivots for pointing: visually-monitored pointing has higher arm elevations than pointing blindfolded.
Wnuczko M; Kennedy JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1485-91. PubMed ID: 21688946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention towards perceptual invariants.
Huet M; Camachon C; Fernandez L; Jacobs DM; Montagne G
Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Aug; 28(4):450-67. PubMed ID: 19394099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
