BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18377174)

  • 21. Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes.
    Ferrari V; Codispoti M; Cardinale R; Bradley MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 20(10):1753-61. PubMed ID: 18370595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emotional modulation of the attentional blink: the neural structures involved in capturing and holding attention.
    Schwabe L; Merz CJ; Walter B; Vaitl D; Wolf OT; Stark R
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):416-25. PubMed ID: 21195103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):364-79. PubMed ID: 16634676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual search for facial expressions of emotion is less affected in simultanagnosia.
    Pegna AJ; Caldara-Schnetzer AS; Khateb A
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 18387530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink.
    Vachon F; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):330-47. PubMed ID: 17469971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence from the attentional blink for different sources of word repetition effects.
    Howard S; Burt JS
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 19854663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parafoveal semantic processing of emotional visual scenes.
    Calvo MG; Lang PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 15982128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When do additional distractors reduce the attentional blink?
    Kawahara J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1043-61. PubMed ID: 19653748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is the emotional modulation of the attentional blink driven by response bias?
    Tibboel H; Van Bockstaele B; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Nov; 25(7):1176-83. PubMed ID: 22017612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X; Liu C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unintended embodiment of concepts into percepts: sensory activation boosts attention for same-modality concepts in the attentional blink paradigm.
    Vermeulen N; Mermillod M; Godefroid J; Corneille O
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 19576578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention modulates initial stages of visual word processing.
    Ruz M; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 20(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 18345981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The attentional blink modulates activity in the early visual cortex.
    Hein G; Alink A; Kleinschmidt A; Müller NG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 18510438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
    Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dissociation of event-related potentials indexing arousal and semantic cohesion during emotional word encoding.
    Dillon DG; Cooper JJ; Grent-'t-Jong T; Woldorff MG; LaBar KS
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Oct; 62(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 16678953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How meaning shapes seeing.
    Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Oct; 18(10):845-9. PubMed ID: 17894599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM
    Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.