310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18377901)
1. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.
Nezhat C; Lavie O; Hsu S; Watson J; Barnett O; Lemyre M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 18377901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes TL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 20303834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic myomectomy: do size, number, and location of the myomas form limiting factors for laparoscopic myomectomy?
Sinha R; Hegde A; Mahajan C; Dubey N; Sundaram M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 18439500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
George A; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of combined laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treatment of symptomatic myoma.
Alborzi S; Ghannadan E; Alborzi S; Alborzi M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):742-7. PubMed ID: 18692826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy.
Sizzi O; Rossetti A; Malzoni M; Minelli L; La Grotta F; Soranna L; Panunzi S; Spagnolo R; Imperato F; Landi S; Fiaccamento A; Stola E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 17630163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Bedient CE; Magrina JF; Noble BN; Kho RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 201(6):566.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19683685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy.
Rodgers AK; Goldberg JM; Hammel JP; Falcone T
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1375-80. PubMed ID: 17540810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy; a feasible technique for removal of unfavorably localized myomas.
Lönnerfors C; Persson J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 19639456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A modified suture technique for laparoscopic myomectomy.
Yuen LT; Hsu LJ; Lee CL; Wang CJ; Soong YK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 17478362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of combined laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy via minilaparotomy in the treatment of recurrent uterine myomas.
Liu WM; Wang PH; Chou CS; Tang WL; Wang IT; Tzeng CR
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 17069812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: short-term outcomes.
Palomba S; Zupi E; Russo T; Falbo A; Marconi D; Tolino A; Manguso F; Mattei A; Zullo F
Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4):942-51. PubMed ID: 17349643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.
Huffmanm LC; Pandalai PK; Boulton BJ; James L; Starnes SL; Reed MF; Howington JA; Nussbaum MS
Surgery; 2007 Oct; 142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. PubMed ID: 17950356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
