These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Statistical inference and sensitivity to sampling in 11-month-old infants. Xu F; Denison S Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19435629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization. Gweon H; Tenenbaum JB; Schulz LE Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 May; 107(20):9066-71. PubMed ID: 20435914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Infant Statisticians: The Origins of Reasoning Under Uncertainty. Denison S; Xu F Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 31185184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where did that come from?--Identifying the source of a sample. Lindskog M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 25163636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction, overhypothesis, and the origin of abstract knowledge. Evidence from 9-month-old infants. Dewar KM; Xu F Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1871-7. PubMed ID: 21078899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probabilistic inference in human infants. Denison S; Xu F Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():27-58. PubMed ID: 23205407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups. Schulze C; Hertwig R Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104580. PubMed ID: 33667974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When children ignore evidence in category-based induction. Irrational inferences? Rhodes M Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():219-35. PubMed ID: 23205413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are great apes able to reason from multi-item samples to populations of food items? Eckert J; Rakoczy H; Call J Am J Primatol; 2017 Oct; 79(10):. PubMed ID: 28877364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterizing the intuitive representation in problem solving: evidence from evaluating mathematical strategies. Dixon JA; Moore CF Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):395-412. PubMed ID: 9184491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibiting intuition: Scaffolding children's theory construction about species evolution in the face of competing explanations. Ronfard S; Brown S; Doncaster E; Kelemen D Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104635. PubMed ID: 33713876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The probable and the possible at 12 months: intuitive reasoning about the uncertain future. Cesana-Arlotti N; Téglás E; Bonatti LL Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():1-25. PubMed ID: 23205406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Rand DG; Brescoll VL; Everett JA; Capraro V; Barcelo H J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Apr; 145(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 26913619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The emergence of probabilistic reasoning in very young infants: evidence from 4.5- and 6-month-olds. Denison S; Reed C; Xu F Dev Psychol; 2013 Feb; 49(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 22545837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]