These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18379312)
1. Detection of in-stent restenosis of coronary stents using 40-detector row computed tomography in vitro. Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Takei R; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Aizawa T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 18379312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis. Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of coronary stents using 40-detector row CT: comparison with 16-detector row CT in vitro. Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Vembar M; Kaminaga T; Takei R; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Aizawa T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):910-6. PubMed ID: 18043356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary artery stent evaluation using a vascular model at 64-detector row CT: comparison between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated axial scans. Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Mehta D; Kaminaga T; Miyazawa A; Ueno Y; Konno K Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19412509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners? Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of coronary stent in vitro on multislice computed tomography angiography: improved in-stent visibility by the use of 140-kV tube voltage. Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Kawasaki T; Konno K; Kozuma K; Isshiki T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 17538289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT (DSCT). Lell MM; Panknin C; Saleh R; Sayre JW; Schmidt B; Dinh H; Ruehm SG Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):536-41. PubMed ID: 17568277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Mahnken AH; Seyfarth T; Flohr T; Herzog C; Stahl J; Stanzel S; Kuettner A; Wildberger JE; Günther RW Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 15597014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents imaging compared with standard-definition 64-row multidectector computed tomography: an initial in vivo study. Yang WJ; Zhang H; Xiao H; Li JY; Liu Y; Pan ZL; Chen KM J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 22592611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Assessment of coronary stent lumen visibility and patency by dual-source computed tomographic angiography]. Kong LY; Liu D; Wang YN; Song L; Zhang ZH; Jin ZY; Zhang SY; Ji B Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 21219784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of attenuation measurement of vascular wall in vitro on computed tomography angiography: Effect of wall thickness, density of contrast medium, and measurement point. Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Konno K; Yokoyama N; Isshiki T Invest Radiol; 2006 Jun; 41(6):510-5. PubMed ID: 16763469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro evaluation of 56 coronary artery stents by 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT. Steen H; André F; Korosoglou G; Mueller D; Hosch W; Kauczor HU; Giannitsis E; Katus HA Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 20817435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis. Chung SH; Kim YJ; Hur J; Lee HJ; Choe KO; Kim TH; Choi BW J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20160604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents. André F; Korosoglou G; Hosch W; Giannitsis E; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Steen H Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 23280306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photon-Counting CT: High-Resolution Imaging of Coronary Stents. Mannil M; Hickethier T; von Spiczak J; Baer M; Henning A; Hertel M; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Maintz D; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 28945655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro. Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro. Blum MB; Schmook M; Schernthaner R; Edelhauser G; Puchner S; Lammer J; Funovics MA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 17954666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]