118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18379312)
1. Detection of in-stent restenosis of coronary stents using 40-detector row computed tomography in vitro.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Takei R; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Aizawa T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 18379312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.
Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of coronary stents using 40-detector row CT: comparison with 16-detector row CT in vitro.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Vembar M; Kaminaga T; Takei R; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Aizawa T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):910-6. PubMed ID: 18043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary artery stent evaluation using a vascular model at 64-detector row CT: comparison between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated axial scans.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Mehta D; Kaminaga T; Miyazawa A; Ueno Y; Konno K
Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19412509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience.
Hong C; Chrysant GS; Woodard PK; Bae KT
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 15304660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.
Oncel D; Oncel G; Karaca M
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 17255411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of coronary stent in vitro on multislice computed tomography angiography: improved in-stent visibility by the use of 140-kV tube voltage.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Kawasaki T; Konno K; Kozuma K; Isshiki T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 17538289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT (DSCT).
Lell MM; Panknin C; Saleh R; Sayre JW; Schmidt B; Dinh H; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):536-41. PubMed ID: 17568277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.
Mahnken AH; Seyfarth T; Flohr T; Herzog C; Stahl J; Stanzel S; Kuettner A; Wildberger JE; Günther RW
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 15597014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents imaging compared with standard-definition 64-row multidectector computed tomography: an initial in vivo study.
Yang WJ; Zhang H; Xiao H; Li JY; Liu Y; Pan ZL; Chen KM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 22592611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Flohr T; Krämer S; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Invest Radiol; 2003 Dec; 38(12):790-5. PubMed ID: 14627897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Assessment of coronary stent lumen visibility and patency by dual-source computed tomographic angiography].
Kong LY; Liu D; Wang YN; Song L; Zhang ZH; Jin ZY; Zhang SY; Ji B
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 21219784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of attenuation measurement of vascular wall in vitro on computed tomography angiography: Effect of wall thickness, density of contrast medium, and measurement point.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Konno K; Yokoyama N; Isshiki T
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jun; 41(6):510-5. PubMed ID: 16763469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro evaluation of 56 coronary artery stents by 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT.
Steen H; André F; Korosoglou G; Mueller D; Hosch W; Kauczor HU; Giannitsis E; Katus HA
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 20817435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis.
Chung SH; Kim YJ; Hur J; Lee HJ; Choe KO; Kim TH; Choi BW
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20160604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents.
André F; Korosoglou G; Hosch W; Giannitsis E; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Steen H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 23280306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photon-Counting CT: High-Resolution Imaging of Coronary Stents.
Mannil M; Hickethier T; von Spiczak J; Baer M; Henning A; Hertel M; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Maintz D; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 28945655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro.
Blum MB; Schmook M; Schernthaner R; Edelhauser G; Puchner S; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 17954666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
