94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18379453)
1. Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification.
Forner Navarro L; Llena Puy MC; García Godoy F
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Apr; 13(4):E261-5. PubMed ID: 18379453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography.
Gakenheimer DC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jul; 133(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 12148682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Kold LM; Kold S
Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Jun; 110(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12120704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: an in-vitro study.
Behere RR; Lele SM
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):362. PubMed ID: 21891917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of clinical axial extension of Class II caries lesions with ultraspeed and digital radiographs: an in-vivo study.
Bin-Shuwaish M; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Neiva G
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 19051853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Mikkelsen L; Mouyen F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 1745523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiology and image analysis for approximal caries diagnosis.
Forner L; Llena MC; Almerich JM; García-Godoy F
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):312-5. PubMed ID: 10823079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical study of direct digital radiography in caries detection].
Hu T; Tan H; Hong L; Wang H
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Jun; 18(3):171-3. PubMed ID: 12539670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions.
Nikneshan S; Abbas FM; Sabbagh S
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 25961607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries.
White SC; Yoon DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement.
Wenzel A
Caries Res; 2001; 35(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 11125191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
