These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18379579)
41. The ethics of biotechnology. Lenoir N J Biolaw Bus; 2000; Suppl.():111-5. PubMed ID: 12739544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Recent progress in agricultural biotechnology and opportunities for contract research and development. Kolodziejczyk PP; Fedec P Adv Exp Med Biol; 1999; 464():5-20. PubMed ID: 10335382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Polymerase chain reaction technology as analytical tool in agricultural biotechnology. Lipp M; Shillito R; Giroux R; Spiegelhalter F; Charlton S; Pinero D; Song P J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(1):136-55. PubMed ID: 15759736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Modern biotechnology breakthroughs to food and agricultural research in developing countries. Yılmaz R GM Crops Food; 2019; 10(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 31055997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Unscientific regulation of agricultural biotechnology: time to hold the policymakers accountable? Miller HI Trends Biotechnol; 1995 Apr; 13(4):123-5. PubMed ID: 7766106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology. Malyska A; Bolla R; Twardowski T Trends Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):530-534. PubMed ID: 27059762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A differentiated assessment of the future of biotechnology. A perspective from an EU member state. Gaugitsch H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2004; 11(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 15259694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Regulation of GMOs in China. Liu Y J Int Bioethique; 2008 Dec; 19(4):139-58, 167. PubMed ID: 19492727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public debate. Pidgeon NF; Poortinga W; Rowe G; Jones TH; Walls J; O'Riordan T Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):467-79. PubMed ID: 15876218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Product, not process! Explaining a basic concept in agricultural biotechnologies and food safety. Tagliabue G Life Sci Soc Policy; 2017 Dec; 13(1):3. PubMed ID: 28255668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Turkish university students' knowledge of biotechnology and attitudes toward biotechnological applications. Öztürk-Akar E Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2017 Mar; 45(2):115-125. PubMed ID: 27613202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Science, biopolitics and risk: margins of uncertainty. Krimsky S Politics Life Sci; 1989 Feb; 7(2):140-2, 149-53. PubMed ID: 17124765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. New Zealand Bioethics Conference February 2004: emerging biotechnologies: ethics and regulation. Evans D N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Feb; 5(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15597488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. A functional abc for biotechnology and the dissemination of its progeny. Cuevas-Badallo A; Vermaas PE Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2011 Jun; 42(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 21486665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Transgenic plants for tropical regions: some considerations about their development and their transfer to the small farmer. Herrera-Estrella L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 May; 96(11):5978-81. PubMed ID: 10339527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Unintended Effects in Genetically Modified Food/Feed Safety: A Way Forward. Fernandez A; Paoletti C Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):872-875. PubMed ID: 29685817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment. Hill RA; Sendashonga C Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 15612274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]