These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18379831)

  • 41. Estimation of Health Utility and Quality Adjusted Life Years in Bilateral Hand Transplantation: A Time Trade-off Study.
    Harijee A; Thankappan K; Sharma M; NageswaraRao NN; Patel T; Bhaskaran R; Raj M; Sundaram KR; Iyer S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Mar; 86(3):345-350. PubMed ID: 32881744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hip and knee implant prices increase 9%.
    Mendenhall S
    OR Manager; 2004 Oct; 20(10):32. PubMed ID: 15521340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The medical arms race.
    Gordon J
    Minn Med; 2007 Feb; 90(2):26-9, 44. PubMed ID: 17388256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Will a 'perfect storm' help control rising orthopedic implant costs?
    Greene J
    OR Manager; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1, 10-2. PubMed ID: 16366208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The cost benefit of total knee arthroplasty.
    Rorabeck CH; Murray P
    Orthopedics; 1996 Sep; 19(9):777-9. PubMed ID: 8887421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. New robot technology indicates bright future for prosthetics.
    Murti A
    Rehab Manag; 2005 Apr; 18(3):10. PubMed ID: 15819271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Which prostheses are cost-effective?
    Lorgelly P; Davies C; Shemilt I; Mugford M; MacGregor A
    Knee; 2009 Dec; 16(6):419. PubMed ID: 20050378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cool running.
    Gibbs N
    Time; 2008 Jan; 171(4):116. PubMed ID: 18271217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. EXERCISE UNIT FOR ABOVE-KNEE AMPUTEES.
    STANFORD W; HOLZAEPFEL DW
    J Assoc Phys Ment Rehabil; 1963; 17():142-3. PubMed ID: 14055462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Life on one leg.
    SUTHERLAND TS
    Practitioner; 1956 Aug; 177(1058):205-6. PubMed ID: 13359203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus.
    Kuhlmann A; Krüger H; Seidinger S; Hahn A
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Apr; 21(3):437-449. PubMed ID: 31897813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study.
    Chen C; Hanson M; Chaturvedi R; Mattke S; Hillestad R; Liu HH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):62. PubMed ID: 30255802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cost comparison: limb salvage versus amputation in diabetic patients with charcot foot.
    Gil J; Schiff AP; Pinzur MS
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1097-9. PubMed ID: 23493775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types.
    Campbell JH; Stevens PM; Wurdeman SR
    J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2020; 7():2055668320968476. PubMed ID: 33224520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
    Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
    Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stratified cost-utility analysis of C-Leg versus mechanical knees: Findings from an Italian sample of transfemoral amputees.
    Cutti AG; Lettieri E; Del Maestro M; Radaelli G; Luchetti M; Verni G; Masella C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):227-236. PubMed ID: 27025244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Outcomes associated with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees among individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss: a systematic review.
    Sawers AB; Hafner BJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(3):273-314. PubMed ID: 23881757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
    Kaufman KR; Frittoli S; Frigo CA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jun; 27(5):460-5. PubMed ID: 22221344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Safety, energy efficiency, and cost efficacy of the C-Leg for transfemoral amputees: A review of the literature.
    Highsmith MJ; Kahle JT; Bongiorni DR; Sutton BS; Groer S; Kaufman KR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Dec; 34(4):362-77. PubMed ID: 20969495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.