519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18379968)
1. [The general practitioner's part in the initiation of diagnostic procedures in prostate cancer].
Braun KP; May M; Grassmel Y; Führer S; Hoschke B; Braun V
Aktuelle Urol; 2008 Mar; 39(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18379968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate-specific antigen testing in general practice: a survey among 325 general practitioners in Denmark.
Jønler M; Eddy B; Poulsen J
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2005; 39(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 16118092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are doctors examining prostates in university hospital?
Lim CH; Quinlan DM
Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):843-5. PubMed ID: 18068436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The assessment of pathological PSA values by the general practitioner--observation or intervention?].
Braun KP; Brookman-Amissah S; May M; Grassmel Y; Hoschke B; Braun V
Aktuelle Urol; 2009 May; 40(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 19479670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The potentially curable prostate cancer patient and the pathways leading to diagnosis and treatment.
Gjengstø P; Eide J; Frugård J; Bakke A; Høisaeter PA
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 15204421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
Luciani LG; De Giorgi G; Valotto C; Zanin M; Bierti S; Zattoni F
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 16527579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [PSA: the difficult position of general practitioners between patients and urologists].
Vincendeau S; Abi Moussa M; Manunta A; Patard JJ; Guillé F; Lobel B
Prog Urol; 2003 Apr; 13(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 12765060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study.
Seo HK; Chung MK; Ryu SB; Lee KH;
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1109-12. PubMed ID: 18158028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of prostate cancer at different levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and different free: total PSA ratios in a consecutive series of men referred for prostate biopsies.
Rydén L; Egevad L; Ekman P; Hellström M
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 17763221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
Philip J; Dutta Roy S; Ballal M; Foster CS; Javlé P
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):969-71. PubMed ID: 15839915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study.
Walsh AL; Considine SW; Thomas AZ; Lynch TH; Manecksha RP
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Dec; 64(629):e783-7. PubMed ID: 25452543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contemporary prostate cancer prevalence among T1c biopsy-referred men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or = 4.0 ng per milliliter.
Ahyai SA; Graefen M; Steuber T; Haese A; Schlomm T; Walz J; Köllermann J; Briganti A; Zacharias M; Friedrich MG; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Huland H; Chun FK
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):750-7. PubMed ID: 17964070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer.
Galić J; Karner I; Cenan L; Tucak A; Hegedus I; Pasini J; Bilandzija-Peranović M; Mihaljević S
Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 12955893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer risk with positive family history, normal prostate examination findings, and PSA less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Canby-Hagino E; Hernandez J; Brand TC; Troyer DA; Higgins B; Ankerst DP; Thompson IM; Leach RJ; Parekh DJ
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):748-52. PubMed ID: 17991549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
