402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18381314)
1. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Catani F; Biasca N; Ensini A; Leardini A; Bianchi L; Digennaro V; Giannini S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Apr; 90(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18381314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Navigated total knee arthroplasty: is it error-free?
Chua KH; Chen Y; Lingaraj K
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Mar; 22(3):643-9. PubMed ID: 24061715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Extra-Articular Deformity: Restoration of Mechanical Alignment Using Accelerometer-Based Navigation System.
Matassi F; Cozzi Lepri A; Innocenti M; Zanna L; Civinini R; Innocenti M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):676-681. PubMed ID: 30685259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An accelerometer-based portable navigation system improved prosthetic alignment after total knee arthroplasty in 3D measurements.
Ueyama H; Minoda Y; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Yamamura K; Nakamura S; Takemura S; Nakamura H
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 May; 27(5):1580-1586. PubMed ID: 30066018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of Ci-navigated extension and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty and analysis of potential predictive variables.
Fickert S; Jawhar A; Sunil P; Scharf HP
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 22072193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.
Matziolis G; Krocker D; Weiss U; Tohtz S; Perka C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 17272435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Kim TK; Chang CB; Kang YG; Chung BJ; Cho HJ; Seong SC
Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19581096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic results of an accelerometer-based, handheld surgical navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Cross M; Deshmane P; Jerabek S; Kang M; Mayman DJ
Orthopedics; 2011 Oct; 34(10):e615-21. PubMed ID: 21956055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Ensini A; Catani F; Leardini A; Romagnoli M; Giannini S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():156-62. PubMed ID: 17195810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system.
Belvedere C; Ensini A; Leardini A; Bianchi L; Catani F; Giannini S
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 17619241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does final component alignment correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty?
Seo SS; Kim CW; Lee CR; Seo JH; Kim DH; Kim OG; Min YK
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 27826637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femur positioning in navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Pfitzner T; Röhner E; Preininger B; Perka C; Matziolis G
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):45-9. PubMed ID: 23026252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is restricted femoral navigation sufficient for accuracy of total knee arthroplasty?
Zumstein MA; Frauchiger L; Wyss D; Hess R; Ballmer PM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Oct; 451():80-6. PubMed ID: 16691146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.
Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK
Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation.
Boonen B; Schotanus MGM; Kerens B; Hulsmans FJ; Tuinebreijer WE; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Sep; 25(9):2809-2817. PubMed ID: 26055253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation.
Kerens B; Leenders AM; Schotanus MGM; Boonen B; Tuinebreijer WE; Emans PJ; Jong B; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29282486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty.
Iorio R; Bolle G; Conteduca F; Valeo L; Conteduca J; Mazza D; Ferretti A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Oct; 21(10):2296-300. PubMed ID: 22527416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Based Navigation-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Outlier Analysis.
Miyasaka T; Kurosaka D; Saito M; Omori T; Ikeda R; Marumo K
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 27369304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
