581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18381334)
21. ICRP recommendations on 'Managing patient dose in digital radiology'.
Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 15933093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality control and patient dosimetry in digital radiology. On line system: new features and transportability.
Vano E; Ten JI; Fernandez JM; Prieto C; Ordiales JM; Martinez D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):144-6. PubMed ID: 18283057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Non-medical exposures--ethical concerns.
O'Reilly G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 19244274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Dose reduction by several measures in X-ray angiographic system].
Saito T
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 12766287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lonizing radiation regulations and the dental practitioner: 3. Quality assurance in dental radiography.
Rout J; Brown J
Dent Update; 2012 Jun; 39(5):334-6, 338-9. PubMed ID: 22852511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiation, thoracic imaging, and children: radiation safety.
Frush DP
Radiol Clin North Am; 2011 Sep; 49(5):1053-69. PubMed ID: 21889021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Medical exposure from computed tomographic examination -a recommendation of dosimetry by film method-].
Yasutomo M; Yagi H
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 12766285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Documentation and constancy evaluation of medical roentgen units. Direct radiography with digital image recording systems].
Huber S
Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(7):238-43. PubMed ID: 10605326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Radiological study of the thorax. Evaluation of efficacy-efficiency of a large-field image intensifier in mass screening].
Bonetti MG; Gregori S; Lamarche V; Radice E; Spiga G; Maggi S; Giorgini P; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1989 Sep; 78(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2798965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
Johnson M
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A dose index as a tool to estimate paediatric patient doses in digital projection radiography.
Garcia Castañon P; España Lopez ML; Fernandez Bedoya V; Bermudez Luna R; Rodriguez Martin G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 21775320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology.
Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors to consider in the transition to digital radiological imaging.
MacDonald D
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19301520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Evaluation of patient exposure to radiation during x-ray diagnostic examinations (in selected health service centers in the city of Wrocław and in the province of Wrocław)].
Demczuk P; Jankowski J
Med Pr; 1997; 48(6):639-50. PubMed ID: 9558632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
