These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18381334)

  • 41. Personal monitoring period for radiographers.
    Doust C
    Radiography; 1986; 52(603):109-12. PubMed ID: 3749488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation and testing of computed radiography systems.
    Charnock P; Connolly PA; Hughes D; Moores BM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15933109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Combined use of real-time digital subtraction radioscopy and computerized tomography: potential advantages in diagnostic and interventional radiology].
    Damascelli B; Frigerio LF; Salvetti M; Marchianò A; Spreafico C; Di Tolla G; Segura C; Rizzo D; Lanocita R; Porcelli G
    Radiol Med; 1992 May; 83(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 1631326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist.
    Mupparapu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):168-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 16102399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dose levels from thoracic and pelvic examinations in two pediatric radiological departments in Norway - a comparison study of dose-area product and radiographic technique.
    Sæther HK; Lagesen B; Trægde Martinsen AC; Holsen EP; Øvrebø KM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1137-42. PubMed ID: 20860497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Low-dose digital roentgenography of the thoracic cavity: comparative evaluation of the method].
    Kitaev VM; Belova IB
    Voen Med Zh; 2003 Mar; 324(3):47-54. PubMed ID: 12722513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Evaluation of patient exposure to X-ray in view of monitoring carried out in diagnostic laboratories of Lódź region].
    Jankowski J; Staniszewska MA; Wrońska S; Wróblewska D; Lesner M
    Med Pr; 2000; 51(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 10971924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patient dosimetry in paediatric diagnostic radiology.
    Borisova R; Ingilizova Ch; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):155-9. PubMed ID: 18287192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A training syllabus for radiation protection in dental radiology.
    Gallagher A; Dowling A; Renehan J; Clarke D; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):219-21. PubMed ID: 18283059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 5: organ doses in chest radiography].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):454-71. PubMed ID: 19391068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Exposure reduction through quality assurance for diagnostic x-ray procedures.
    Lipoti JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):577-85. PubMed ID: 18849692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
    Patrux C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 19589882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Radiation Protection in Digital Radiography.
    Moore QT
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Sep; 88(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 27601688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
    Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.