These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18382603)

  • 1. NML computation algorithms for tree-structured multinomial Bayesian networks.
    Kontkanen P; Wettig H; Myllymäki P
    EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol; 2007; 2007(1):90947. PubMed ID: 18382603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference of gene regulatory networks based on a universal minimum description length.
    Dougherty J; Tabus I; Astola J
    EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol; 2008; 2008(1):482090. PubMed ID: 18437238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Lintusaari J; Gutmann MU; Dutta R; Kaski S; Corander J
    Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 66(1):e66-e82. PubMed ID: 28175922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the minimum description length principle to reduce the rate of false positives of best-fit algorithms.
    Fang J; Ouyang H; Shen L; Dougherty ER; Liu W
    EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol; 2014 Dec; 2014():13. PubMed ID: 28194163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model Selection for Non-Negative Tensor Factorization with Minimum Description Length.
    Fu Y; Matsushima S; Yamanishi K
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Jun; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33267345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum description length model selection of multinomial processing tree models.
    Wu H; Myung JI; Batchelder WH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):275-86. PubMed ID: 20551349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian inference of phylogenetic networks from bi-allelic genetic markers.
    Zhu J; Wen D; Yu Y; Meudt HM; Nakhleh L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005932. PubMed ID: 29320496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast likelihood-based inference for latent count models using the saddlepoint approximation.
    Zhang W; Bravington MV; Fewster RM
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):723-733. PubMed ID: 30690707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tutorial introduction to Bayesian inference for stochastic epidemic models using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Kypraios T; Neal P; Prangle D
    Math Biosci; 2017 May; 287():42-53. PubMed ID: 27444577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Fast Numerical Method for Max-Convolution and the Application to Efficient Max-Product Inference in Bayesian Networks.
    Serang O
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):770-83. PubMed ID: 26161499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An automatic adaptive method to combine summary statistics in approximate Bayesian computation.
    Harrison JU; Baker RE
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236954. PubMed ID: 32760106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian model selection and minimum description length estimation of auditory-nerve discharge rates.
    Mark KE; Miller MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):989-1002. PubMed ID: 1313465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate Bayesian computation schemes for parameter inference of discrete stochastic models using simulated likelihood density.
    Wu Q; Smith-Miles K; Tian T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S3. PubMed ID: 25473744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian exponential random graph modelling of interhospital patient referral networks.
    Caimo A; Pallotti F; Lomi A
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2902-2920. PubMed ID: 28421624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive minimum description length principle approach to inferring gene regulatory networks.
    Chaitankar V; Zhang C; Ghosh P; Gong P; Perkins EJ; Deng Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():37-43. PubMed ID: 21431544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trans-Causalizing NAT-Modeled Bayesian Networks.
    Xiang Y; Loker D
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 May; 52(5):3553-3566. PubMed ID: 32763860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectation propagation for large scale Bayesian inference of non-linear molecular networks from perturbation data.
    Narimani Z; Beigy H; Ahmad A; Masoudi-Nejad A; Fröhlich H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171240. PubMed ID: 28166542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient sampling for Bayesian inference of conjunctive Bayesian networks.
    Sakoparnig T; Beerenwinkel N
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):2318-24. PubMed ID: 22782551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust unified Granger causality analysis: a normalized maximum likelihood form.
    Hu Z; Li F; Cheng M; Shui J; Tang Y; Lin Q
    Brain Inform; 2021 Aug; 8(1):15. PubMed ID: 34363137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian inference under cluster sampling with probability proportional to size.
    Makela S; Si Y; Gelman A
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3849-3868. PubMed ID: 29974495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.