217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18382871)
1. Attitudes towards cesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists.
Gunnervik C; Sydsjö G; Sydsjö A; Selling KE; Josefsson A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 18382871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Swedish caregivers' attitudes towards caesarean section on maternal request.
Karlström A; Engström-Olofsson R; Nystedt A; Thomas J; Hildingsson I
Women Birth; 2009 Jun; 22(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 19195958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns.
Bettes BA; Coleman VH; Zinberg S; Spong CY; Portnoy B; DeVoto E; Schulkin J
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 17197588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.
Arikan DC; Ozer A; Arikan I; Coskun A; Kiran H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 20872227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries.
Habiba M; Kaminski M; Da Frè M; Marsal K; Bleker O; Librero J; Grandjean H; Gratia P; Guaschino S; Heyl W; Taylor D; Cuttini M
BJOG; 2006 Jun; 113(6):647-56. PubMed ID: 16709207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obstetricians' and midwives' attitudes toward cesarean section.
Monari F; Di Mario S; Facchinetti F; Basevi V
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18507584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient refusal of emergency cesarean delivery: a study of obstetricians' attitudes in Europe.
Cuttini M; Habiba M; Nilstun T; Donfrancesco S; Garel M; Arnaud C; Bleker O; Da Frè M; Gomez MM; Heyl W; Marsal K; Saracci R;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1121-9. PubMed ID: 17077233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Jordanian obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery.
Lataifeh I; Zayed F; Al-Kuran O; Al-Mehaisen L; Khriesat W; Khader Y
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):733-6. PubMed ID: 19306134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.
Wax JR; Cartin A; Pinette MG; Blackstone J
Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 16128974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.
Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Obstetricians' attitudes to caesarean delivery on maternal request in Nigeria.
Chigbu CO; Ezenyeaku CC; Ezenkwele EP
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(8):813-7. PubMed ID: 21126119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea--a society with high cesarean section rates.
Lee SI; Khang YH; Lee MS
Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 15153130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scottish female obstetricians' views on elective caesarean section and personal choice for delivery.
MacDonald C; Pinion SB; MacLeod UM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Nov; 22(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 12554241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Obstetricians' perspective towards cesarean section delivery based on professional level: experience from Egypt.
Shaaban MM; Sayed Ahmed WA; Khadr Z; El-Sayed HF
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 286(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22437189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Caesarean section on demand: influence of personal birth experience and working environment on attitude of German gynaecologists.
Faas-Fehervary P; Schwarz K; Bauer L; Melchert F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Oct; 122(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 16219516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Caesarean section on request: are there loco-regional factors influencing maternal choice? An Italian experience.
Mancuso A; De Vivo A; Fanara G; Albiero A; Priolo AM; Giacobbe A; Franchi M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 May; 28(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 18604668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Estimate of expected cesarean section rate for maternal indications in a population of pregnant women in West Africa (MOMA survey)].
Dumont A; De Bernis L; Bouvier-Colle MH; Bréart G;
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Feb; 31(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 11976584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure.
Vimercati A; Greco P; Kardashi A; Rossi C; Loizzi V; Scioscia M; Loverro G
J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10875095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
