These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18382994)

  • 1. Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss.
    Pitter MC; Anderson P; Blissett A; Pemberton N
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Jun; 4(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18382994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.
    Nezhat C; Lavie O; Hsu S; Watson J; Barnett O; Lemyre M
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 18377901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of robotic surgery on obstetric-gynecologic resident training.
    Brenot K; Goyert GL
    J Reprod Med; 2009; 54(11-12):675-7. PubMed ID: 20120900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
    Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
    Sert MB; Eraker R
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.
    Tseng JF; Pisters PW; Lee JE; Wang H; Gomez HF; Sun CC; Evans DB
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 17383522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
    Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon.
    Bell MC; Torgerson JL; Kreaden U
    S D Med; 2009 Mar; 62(3):91, 93-5. PubMed ID: 19480272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a University hospital.
    Marengo F; Larraín D; Babilonti L; Spinillo A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 21779771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Hysterectomies in patients with no history of vaginal delivery. A study of 243 cases].
    Dhainaut C; Salomon LJ; Junger M; Marcollet A; Madelenat P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15752660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate.
    Schroeck FR; de Sousa CA; Kalman RA; Kalia MS; Pierre SA; Haleblian GE; Sun L; Moul JW; Albala DM
    Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 18387389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
    Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic urological surgery in patients with prior abdominal operations is not associated with increased complications.
    Nazemi T; Galich A; Smith L; Balaji KC
    Int J Urol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 16643618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.