90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18383463)
1. Sonographic examination of uteroplacental separation during the third stage of labor.
Mo A; Rogers MS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 31(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 18383463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Down-up sequential separation of the placenta.
Herman A; Zimerman A; Arieli S; Tovbin Y; Bezer M; Bukovsky I; Panski M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 11896951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Observation of course of placental separation by continuous dynamic ultrasonography during third stage of labor].
Cai XY; He CZ; Feng PZ; Lu YH; Wang XM; Wang Y; Huang WQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Apr; 38(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 12885367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Length of the third stage of labor at term pregnancies is shorter if placenta is located at fundus: prospective study.
Altay MM; Ilhan AK; Haberal A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 17845322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gray scale and color Doppler sonography in the third stage of labor for early detection of failed placental separation.
Krapp M; Baschat AA; Hankeln M; Gembruch U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 10775997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study.
Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Bradburn E; Giggens R; Chan DC; Stalder C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 22323094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery.
Sambaziotis H; Conway C; Figueroa R; Elimian A; Garry D
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jul; 23(7):907-11; quiz 913-4. PubMed ID: 15292558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy.
Jastrow N; Gauthier RJ; Gagnon G; Leroux N; Beaudoin F; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):563.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20042176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of risk factors for uteroplacental apoplexy complicating placental abruption].
Cheng WW; Lin SQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):593-6. PubMed ID: 19087494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after Cesarean section.
Zimmer EZ; Bardin R; Tamir A; Bronshtein M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):594-8. PubMed ID: 15170802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complicated third stage of labor: time to switch on the scanner.
Herman A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10775987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonography of the gravid uterus and placenta: current concepts.
Harris RD; Barth RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 8430536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of ultrasonic placental localization in pregnancy after caesarean section.
Nzeh DA; Adetoro OO
Cent Afr J Med; 1990 Aug; 36(8):193-5. PubMed ID: 2282649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mechanism of placental detachment in the postnatal period].
Voskresenskiĭ SL
Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Jul; (7):42-5. PubMed ID: 1951971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The duration of the third stage of labor is subject to the location of placental implantation.
Lurie S; Gomel A; Sadan O; Ginath S; Rotmensch S; Glezerman M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 56(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 12867762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Trial vaginal delivery for women with previous cesarean section].
Zheng CW; Hong W; Lin FG
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):456-7, 508. PubMed ID: 7835113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.
Melamed N; Segev M; Hadar E; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 209(1):49.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23507547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus.
Locatelli A; Ghidini A; Ciriello E; Incerti M; Bonardi C; Regalia AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Aug; 19(8):471-5. PubMed ID: 16966111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section.
Yang JI; Lim YK; Kim HS; Chang KH; Lee JP; Ryu HS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 16858740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Transvaginal ultrasonic evaluation of the thickness of the section of the uterine wall in previous cesarean sections].
Montanari L; Alfei A; Drovanti A; Lepadatu C; Lorenzi D; Facchini D; Iervasi MT; Sampaolo P
Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Apr; 51(4):107-12. PubMed ID: 10379144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
