1758 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18383515)
1. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
Steven K; Poulsen AL
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of lymph node density in predicting survival of patients with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional study.
Osawa T; Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Kubota K; Matsuno Y; Shibata T; Shinno Y; Kamota S; Minami K; Sakashita S; Kumagai A; Mori T; Nonomura K
Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):274-8; discussion 278. PubMed ID: 19087211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base.
Konety BR; Joslyn SA; O'Donnell MA
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):946-50. PubMed ID: 12576819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Mills RD; Turner WH; Fleischmann A; Markwalder R; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11435814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with overall survival, cause-specific survival, and local and distant recurrence in patients with negative lymph nodes at radical cystectomy.
Lotan Y; Gupta A; Shariat SF; Palapattu GS; Vazina A; Karakiewicz PI; Bastian PJ; Rogers CG; Amiel G; Perotte P; Schoenberg MP; Lerner SP; Sagalowsky AI
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(27):6533-9. PubMed ID: 16116151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer.
Herr HW
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):943-5. PubMed ID: 12576818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy and standardized extended lymphadenectomy for node-positive bladder cancer: prediction by lymph node positivity and density.
Wiesner C; Salzer A; Thomas C; Gellermann-Schultes C; Gillitzer R; Hampel C; Thüroff JW
BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 19220265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
Stein JP
Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival.
Dotan ZA; Kavanagh K; Yossepowitch O; Kaag M; Olgac S; Donat M; Herr HW
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2308-12; discussion 2313. PubMed ID: 17936804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between the number of dissected lymph nodes during pelvic lymphadenectomy and cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node-negative urothelial carcinoma of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy.
May M; Herrmann E; Bolenz C; Brookman-May S; Tiemann A; Moritz R; Fritsche HM; Burger M; Trojan L; Michel MS; Wülfing C; Müller SC; Ellinger J; Buchner A; Stief CG; Tilki D; Wieland WF; Gilfrich C; Höfner T; Hohenfellner M; Haferkamp A; Roigas J; Zacharias M; Bastian PJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):2018-25. PubMed ID: 21246405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium.
Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Palapattu GS; Lotan Y; Rogers CG; Amiel GE; Vazina A; Gupta A; Bastian PJ; Sagalowsky AI; Schoenberg MP; Lerner SP
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2414-22; discussion 2422. PubMed ID: 17085118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of lymphadenectomy in high-grade invasive bladder cancer.
Stein JP; Skinner DG
Urol Clin North Am; 2005 May; 32(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 15862616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.
Stein JP; Cai J; Groshen S; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12796639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superficial (pT2a) and deep (pT2b) muscle invasion in pathological staging of bladder cancer following radical cystectomy.
Yu RJ; Stein JP; Cai J; Miranda G; Groshen S; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):493-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 16813876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes and recurrence predictors of lymph node positive urothelial cancer after cystectomy.
Bruins HM; Huang GJ; Cai J; Skinner DG; Stein JP; Penson DF
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2182-7. PubMed ID: 19758623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New markers for pharmacological targeting in bladder cancer with lymph node metastasis].
Herrmann E; Eltze E; Köpke T; Bolenz C; Bierer S; Neumann J; Hertle L; Wülfing C
Aktuelle Urol; 2007 Sep; 38(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 17907066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Significance of pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prognosis after radical cystectomy].
Leissner J; Allhoff EP; Hohenfellner R; Wolf HK
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Apr; 127(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12085284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node yield at radical cystectomy predicts mortality in node-negative and not node-positive patients.
Morgan TM; Barocas DA; Penson DF; Chang SS; Ni S; Clark PE; Smith JA; Cookson MS
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):632-40. PubMed ID: 22795379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
