153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18383663)
1. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms.
Yoon HJ; Zheng B; Sahiner B; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2024-38. PubMed ID: 17654906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation and comparison of CAD system performance in clinical settings.
Bornefalk H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 15935967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.
Bornefalk H; Hermansson AB
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 15789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consistency of methods for analysing location-specific data.
Zanca F; Chakraborty DP; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):52-6. PubMed ID: 20159917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Hakim CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 21343521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC.
Zheng B; Chakraborty DP; Rockette HE; Maitz GS; Gur D
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1031-4. PubMed ID: 15895587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.
Chan HP; Wei J; Zhang Y; Helvie MA; Moore RH; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4087-95. PubMed ID: 18841861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of the order of overall performance levels under different reading paradigms.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Klym AH; Cohen CS; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Perrin RL; Poller WR; Shah R; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Rockette HE
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 19000873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis of Image Search-and-Localize Tasks.
Jiang Y
Acad Radiol; 2020 Dec; 27(12):1742-1750. PubMed ID: 32033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 23040503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
