BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18383674)

  • 1. Comparison of mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography prostate localization with online ultrasound and fiducial markers methods.
    Gayou O; Miften M
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 18383674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of anatomical interventions on the localization of post-prostatectomy cancer patients.
    Diot Q; Olsen C; Kavanagh B; Raben D; Miften M
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):629-37. PubMed ID: 20229872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Barney BM; Lee RJ; Handrahan D; Welsh KT; Cook JT; Sause WT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):301-5. PubMed ID: 20864274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Scarbrough TJ; Golden NM; Ting JY; Fuller CD; Wong A; Kupelian PA; Thomas CR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jun; 65(2):378-87. PubMed ID: 16563658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
    Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using implanted fiducial markers with daily portal imaging: assessment of prostate organ motion.
    Chen J; Lee RJ; Handrahan D; Sause WT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):912-9. PubMed ID: 17459605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate.
    Moseley DJ; White EA; Wiltshire KL; Rosewall T; Sharpe MB; Siewerdsen JH; Bissonnette JP; Gospodarowicz M; Warde P; Catton CN; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):942-53. PubMed ID: 17293243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of implanted gold fiducial markers with MV-CBCT image-guided IMRT for pancreatic tumours.
    Packard M; Gayou O; Gurram K; Weiss B; Thakkar S; Kirichenko A
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Aug; 59(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 25754023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer.
    Dzierma Y; Beyhs M; Palm J; Niewald M; Bell K; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C
    Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1055-1059. PubMed ID: 26476789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of setup error using different reference images: a phantom and lung cancer patients study.
    Jiang B; Dai J; Zhang Y; Zhang K; Men K; Zhou Z; Liang J; Wang L
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21741820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vector analysis of prostate patient setup with image-guided radiation therapy via kV cone beam computed tomography.
    Perks J; Turnbull H; Liu T; Purdy J; Valicenti R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(3):915-9. PubMed ID: 20643510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative assessment of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional ultrasound and cone beam CT.
    Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Ganswindt U; Manapov F; Tritschler S; Roosen A; Gratzke C; Reiner M; Belka C
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():82. PubMed ID: 25890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of in-room computerized tomography options for detection of fiducial markers in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Owen R; Foroudi F; Kron T; Milner A; Cox J; Cramb J; Zhu L; Duchesne G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(4):1248-56. PubMed ID: 20610045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3 different techniques: localization data of 186 patients.
    Garibaldi C; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Zerini D; Cambria R; Ferrari A; Serafini F; Cattani F; Tagaste B; Fodor C; Luraschi R; Orecchia R
    Tumori; 2015; 101(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 25908027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound versus Cone-beam CT image-guided radiotherapy for prostate and post-prostatectomy pretreatment localization.
    Fargier-Voiron M; Presles B; Pommier P; Munoz A; Rit S; Sarrut D; Biston MC
    Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):997-1004. PubMed ID: 26422200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyses of the factors influencing the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in comparison with cone-beam CT in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation.
    Zhou S; Luo L; Li J; Lin M; Chen L; Shao J; Lu S; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Chen W; Liu M; Liu S; He L
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 30696488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging a moving lung tumor with megavoltage cone beam computed tomography.
    Gayou O; Colonias A
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2347-53. PubMed ID: 25979029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linearity of patient positioning detection : a phantom study of skin markers, cone beam computed tomography, and 3D ultrasound.
    Ballhausen H; Hieber S; Li M; Parodi K; Belka C; Reiner M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 May; 191(5):442-7. PubMed ID: 25633164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer.
    Eren MF; Çolpan Öksüz D; Sayan M; Karaçam S; Vergalasova I; Ay Eren A; Öner Dinçbaş F
    Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9916. PubMed ID: 32850264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.