388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18383678)
1. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters.
Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1018-27. PubMed ID: 21452739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.
Chang Y; Xiao F; Quan H; Yang Z
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):241. PubMed ID: 33069253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of optimal PTV margin for patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: comparative analysis based on CBCT dose calculation with four different margins.
Gill SK; Reddy K; Campbell N; Chen C; Pearson D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):252–262. PubMed ID: 26699581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher M; Silva J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1102-11. PubMed ID: 22320820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of action thresholds for electromagnetic tracking system-guided hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Zhang P; Mah D; Happersett L; Cox B; Hunt M; Mageras G
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4001-8. PubMed ID: 21858997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric assessment of rigid setup error by CBCT for HN-IMRT.
Worthy D; Wu Q
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 May; 11(3):3187. PubMed ID: 20717085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors with direct simulation in a treatment planning system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
Peng JL; Liu C; Chen Y; Amdur RJ; Vanek K; Li JG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 12(3):3422. PubMed ID: 21844852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
