These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1838389)

  • 1. On the conditions necessary for obtaining argument structure complexity effects.
    Schmauder AR; Kennison SM; Clifton C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Nov; 17(6):1188-92. PubMed ID: 1838389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Argument structure frames: a lexical complexity metric?
    Schmauder AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 1826732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verb effects during sentence processing.
    Shapiro LP; Brookins B; Gordon B; Nagel N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Sep; 17(5):983-96. PubMed ID: 1834779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Participant roles and the processing of verbs during sentence comprehension.
    Ahrens K; Swinney D
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1995 Nov; 24(6):533-47. PubMed ID: 8531172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-dependent neural and behavioral effects of verb argument structure features.
    Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Brain Lang; 2017 May; 168():57-72. PubMed ID: 28160740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological indices of lexical processing: the effects of verb complexity and age.
    Rubin SS; Newhoff M; Peach RK; Shapiro LP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 39(5):1071-80. PubMed ID: 8898259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension.
    Speer SR; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):965-78. PubMed ID: 9796230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can we separate verbs from their argument structure? A group study in aphasia.
    Caley S; Whitworth A; Claessen M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jan; 52(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 27296470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Argument status and PP-attachment.
    Boland JE; Blodgett A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Sep; 35(5):385-403. PubMed ID: 16838129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The processing of blend words in naming and sentence reading.
    Johnson RL; Slate SR; Teevan AR; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):847-857. PubMed ID: 29554832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the costs of parallel processing in dual-task performance: The case of lexical processing in word production.
    Paucke M; Oppermann F; Koch I; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 26375632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response execution in lexical decision tasks obscures sex-specific lateralization effects in language processing: evidence from event-related potential measures during word reading.
    Hill H; Ott F; Herbert C; Weisbrod M
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jul; 16(7):978-89. PubMed ID: 16177269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: an analysis of 2,342 words.
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1072-82. PubMed ID: 17654392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.
    Friedrich FJ; Henik A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):792-806. PubMed ID: 1834791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment.
    Pickering MJ; Traxler MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1401-10. PubMed ID: 11713875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.