These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18384086)

  • 1. Towards an integrated description of hydrogen bonding and dehydration: decreasing false positives in virtual screening with the HYDE scoring function.
    Reulecke I; Lange G; Albrecht J; Klein R; Rarey M
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Jun; 3(6):885-97. PubMed ID: 18384086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.
    Friesner RA; Murphy RB; Repasky MP; Frye LL; Greenwood JR; Halgren TA; Sanschagrin PC; Mainz DT
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(21):6177-96. PubMed ID: 17034125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens.
    Perola E
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 16708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.
    Pei J; Wang Q; Zhou J; Lai L
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15390269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening.
    Prathipati P; Saxena AK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 16426038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thermodynamics of buried water clusters at a protein-ligand binding interface.
    Li Z; Lazaridis T
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jan; 110(3):1464-75. PubMed ID: 16471698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual high-throughput screening of molecular databases.
    Seifert MH; Kraus J; Kramer B
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 17554856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PEARLS: program for energetic analysis of receptor-ligand system.
    Han LY; Lin HH; Li ZR; Zheng CJ; Cao ZW; Xie B; Chen YZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):445-50. PubMed ID: 16426079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydrogen bonding interactions of covalently bonded fluorine atoms: from crystallographic data to a new angular function in the GRID force field.
    Carosati E; Sciabola S; Cruciani G
    J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(21):5114-25. PubMed ID: 15456255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes of kinases: a comparative study.
    Panigrahi SK
    Amino Acids; 2008 May; 34(4):617-33. PubMed ID: 18180869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binding estimation after refinement, a new automated procedure for the refinement and rescoring of docked ligands in virtual screening.
    Rastelli G; Degliesposti G; Del Rio A; Sgobba M
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Mar; 73(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19207463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function.
    Schneider N; Lange G; Hindle S; Klein R; Rarey M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2013 Jan; 27(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 23269578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel method for generating structure-based pharmacophores using energetic analysis.
    Salam NK; Nuti R; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2356-68. PubMed ID: 19761201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 18229906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tautomer preference in PDB complexes and its impact on structure-based drug discovery.
    Milletti F; Vulpetti A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1062-74. PubMed ID: 20515065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.