These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18384189)

  • 1. Comments on 'The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios'.
    Graf E; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3915-7; author reply 3918-20. PubMed ID: 18384189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inverse probability weighted estimation of the marginal odds ratio: correspondence regarding 'The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios'.
    Forbes A; Shortreed S
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5556-9; author reply 5560-3. PubMed ID: 18613263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of conditional and marginal odds-ratios for analysing familial aggregation of binary data.
    FitzGerald PE; Knuiman MW
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 10723105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Groenwold RH; de Groot MC; Ramamoorthy D; Souverein PC; Klungel OH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 26559329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
    Arbogast PG; Ray WA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.
    Kurth T; Walker AM; Glynn RJ; Chan KA; Gaziano JM; Berger K; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 163(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 16371515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of sampling bias of odds ratios for vertebral fractures using propensity scores.
    Lu Y; Jin H; Chen MH; Glüer CC
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(4):507-20. PubMed ID: 16369725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited commentary: advancing propensity score methods in epidemiology.
    Oakes JM; Church TR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 May; 165(10):1119-21; discussion 1122-3. PubMed ID: 17395596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing odds ratios measuring improvement or deterioration across repeated exposure or treatment sessions.
    Ohman Strickland PA; Lu SE
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):449-61. PubMed ID: 17563103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A new statistical method on familial correlation dealing with family data from case-control studies].
    Gao YH; Jiang QW; Zhou XF; Ding BG; Wang RH; Zhao GM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 25(11):992-6. PubMed ID: 15769338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple logistic regression models--what are they?
    Campbell M
    Midwifery; 2004 Sep; 20(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15337279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of propensity score calibration--a simulation study.
    Stürmer T; Schneeweiss S; Rothman KJ; Avorn J; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 May; 165(10):1110-8. PubMed ID: 17395595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating Risk Ratios and Risk Differences Using Regression.
    Naimi AI; Whitcomb BW
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 189(6):508-510. PubMed ID: 32219364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Confounding bias. Interaction].
    Gili M; Zunzunegui MV; Vilches A
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1990 Dec; 8(10):647-53. PubMed ID: 2098126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.
    Bieler GS; Brown GG; Williams RL; Brogan DJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(5):618-23. PubMed ID: 20133516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations between Depressive State and Impaired Higher-Level Functional Capacity in the Elderly with Long-Term Care Requirements.
    Ogata S; Hayashi C; Sugiura K; Hayakawa K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127410. PubMed ID: 26035183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.