These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18384265)

  • 1. Adapting prediction error estimates for biased complexity selection in high-dimensional bootstrap samples.
    Binder H; Schumacher M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article12. PubMed ID: 18384265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Boosting for high-dimensional time-to-event data with competing risks.
    Binder H; Allignol A; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):890-6. PubMed ID: 19244389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general, prediction error-based criterion for selecting model complexity for high-dimensional survival models.
    Porzelius C; Schumacher M; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):830-8. PubMed ID: 20213716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of survival prediction models based on microarray data.
    Schumacher M; Binder H; Gerds T
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(14):1768-74. PubMed ID: 17485430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods.
    Molinaro AM; Simon R; Pfeiffer RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3301-7. PubMed ID: 15905277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.
    Jiang W; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boosting method for nonlinear transformation models with censored survival data.
    Lu W; Li L
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 18344565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of resampling methods for assessment of survival risk prediction in high-dimensional settings.
    Subramanian J; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2011 Mar; 30(6):642-53. PubMed ID: 21337359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data.
    Ambroise C; McLachlan GJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 May; 99(10):6562-6. PubMed ID: 11983868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview of techniques for linking high-dimensional molecular data to time-to-event endpoints by risk prediction models.
    Binder H; Porzelius C; Schumacher M
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):170-89. PubMed ID: 21328602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of evaluation criteria for survival prediction from genomic data.
    Bøvelstad HM; Borgan O
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 21308723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling.
    Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bagging survival trees.
    Hothorn T; Lausen B; Benner A; Radespiel-Tröger M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 14695641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-dimensional data analysis: selection of variables, data compression and graphics--application to gene expression.
    Läuter J; Horn F; Rosołowski M; Glimm E
    Biom J; 2009 Apr; 51(2):235-51. PubMed ID: 19358215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time dependent ROC curves for the estimation of true prognostic capacity of microarray data.
    Foucher Y; Danger R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Nov; 11(6):Article 1. PubMed ID: 23183763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap model selection had similar performance for selecting authentic and noise variables compared to backward variable elimination: a simulation study.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1009-17.e1. PubMed ID: 18539429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis with selection of variables.
    Snapinn SM; Knoke JD
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):289-99. PubMed ID: 2720056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additive risk models for survival data with high-dimensional covariates.
    Ma S; Kosorok MR; Fine JP
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 16542247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence scores for prediction models.
    Gerds TA; van de Wiel MA
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 21328604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
    Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.