126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18384403)
1. Marginal bone loss at implants: a retrospective, long-term follow-up of turned Brånemark System implants.
Pikner SS; Gröndahl K; Jemt T; Friberg B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 18384403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses.
Jemt T; Johansson J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
Pikner SS
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full-arch bridges. Results after 12-15 years.
Ravald N; Dahlgren S; Teiwik A; Gröndahl K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1144-51. PubMed ID: 22762251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study.
Gualini F; Gualini G; Cominelli R; Lekholm U
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 18783416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants.
Fransson C; Lekholm U; Jemt T; Berglundh T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 16117768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible.
Van de Velde T; Collaert B; Sennerby L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 19220843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 23879577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function.
Lekholm U; Gröndahl K; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):178-86. PubMed ID: 17100743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term follow-up of CeraOne™ single-implant restorations: an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort.
Bergenblock S; Andersson B; Fürst B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 20586784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Demographics of implant placement and complications of a patient subgroup in a dental hospital population.
Brennan M; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; O'Connell B
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2010; 56(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 20476636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implants and sinus-inlay graft in a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophied maxillae: prosthodontic aspects in a 3-year follow-up study.
Smedberg JI; Johansson P; Ekenbäck D; Wannfors D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11669249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tooth-implant supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective multicenter study.
Lindh T; Dahlgren S; Gunnarsson K; Josefsson T; Nilson H; Wilhelmsson P; Gunne J
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11508086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment concept of the edentulous mandible with prefabricated telescopic abutments and immediate functional loading.
Romanos GE; May S; May D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 21691607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
