These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18385297)

  • 1. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Muellenbach RM; Wunder C; Brederlau J
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1236. PubMed ID: 18385297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Kacmarek RM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1232-3; discussion 1233-5. PubMed ID: 18385294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Point: High-frequency ventilation is the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Ferguson ND; Slutsky AS
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1230-1. PubMed ID: 18048584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Vento G; Tana M; Tirone C; Vendettuoli V
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1237. PubMed ID: 18472429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Lucangelo U; Zin WA
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1238-9. PubMed ID: 18472432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Last word on point:counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Kacmarek RM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1241. PubMed ID: 18385299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Bollen CW; van Vught AJ; Uiterwaal CS
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1238. PubMed ID: 18472431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Last word on point:counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Ferguson N; Slutsky A
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1240. PubMed ID: 18385298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Baumgardner JE; Markstaller K; Otto CM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1239. PubMed ID: 18472433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Froese A
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1237-8. PubMed ID: 18472430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Villar J
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1236. PubMed ID: 18472427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
    Rotta AT; Maruvada S
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Apr; 104(4):1236-7. PubMed ID: 18472428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Change from conventional ventilation to high-frequency jet ventilation in patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)].
    Belda FJ; Maruenda A; Barberá M; Frasquet FJ; Chulià V
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1988; 35(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 3051178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The role of high frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome].
    Zhan QY
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 30(10):740-1. PubMed ID: 18218202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High frequency jet ventilation for respiratory failure in newborn infants.
    Esslinger J
    Nebr Med J; 1992 Jul; 77(7):156-7. PubMed ID: 1407218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bronchoscopic findings in infants treated with high-frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation.
    Kercsmar CM; Martin RJ; Chatburn RL; Carlo WA
    Pediatrics; 1988 Dec; 82(6):884-7. PubMed ID: 3186379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evidence-based approach to acute respiratory distress syndrome.
    Meade MO; Herridge MS
    Respir Care; 2001 Dec; 46(12):1368-76; discussion 1376-9. PubMed ID: 11728297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-frequency jet ventilation.
    Bunnell JB
    Respir Care; 2001 Aug; 46(8):826-8. PubMed ID: 11515495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the failure of mechanical ventilation: new therapeutic options.
    Goldsmith JP; Arensman RM
    Neonatal Intensive Care; 1990; 3(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 10149812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants.
    Courtney SE; Durand DJ; Asselin JM; Eichenwald EC; Stark AR
    Crit Care; 2003 Dec; 7(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 14624681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.