296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18385408)
1. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
Angell E; Biggs H; Gahleitner F; Dixon-Woods M
Arch Dis Child; 2010 Nov; 95(11):915-7. PubMed ID: 20573742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters.
Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft RE; Bryman A
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 17490795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison.
Angell E; Sutton AJ; Windridge K; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2006 Nov; 32(11):662-4. PubMed ID: 17074825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Drug development: assessment of pharmacogenetic studies by Spanish research ethics committees.
Dal-Ré R; Luque I; Torres R; Lahuerta J
Pharmacogenomics J; 2009 Apr; 9(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 19079365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
Tod AM; Nicolson P; Allmark P
J Adv Nurs; 2002 Nov; 40(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 12421396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Morejón E
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 31(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15923484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
Beyleveld D
Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences between research ethics committees.
Edwards SJ; Stone T; Swift T
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17234012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.
Long T; Fallon D
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17655528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nature and extent of changes in the patient's information sheets of international multicentre clinical trials as requested by Spanish Research Ethics Committees.
Dal-Ré R; Morejón E; Ortega R
Med Clin (Barc); 2004 Dec; 123(20):770-4. PubMed ID: 15607068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Text-work' in Research Ethics Review: The significance of documents in and beyond committee meetings.
Morton J
Account Res; 2018; 25(7-8):387-403. PubMed ID: 30343597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
