405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18385577)
1. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.
Seaman S; Herbster S; Muglia J; Murray M; Rick C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):18-27. PubMed ID: 11189544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study to compare the overall performance of two hydrocolloid dressings on partial thickness wounds.
Watts C; Shipes E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():28-31. PubMed ID: 3250578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing.
Kloth LC; Berman JE; Dumit-Minkel S; Sutton CH; Papanek PE; Wurzel J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11074989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.
Friedman SJ; Su WP
Arch Dermatol; 1984 Oct; 120(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 6486846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of a polymeric membrane dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
Carr RD; Lalagos DE
Decubitus; 1990 Aug; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 2205233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure sore management: efficacy of a moisture reactive occlusive dressing.
Yarkony GM; Kramer E; King R; Lukanc C; Carle TV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Oct; 65(10):597-600. PubMed ID: 6487064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.
van Rijswijk L
Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8427640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers.
Cordts PR; Hanrahan LM; Rodriguez AA; Woodson J; LaMorte WW; Menzoian JO
J Vasc Surg; 1992 Mar; 15(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 1538504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting outcomes for stage IV pressure ulcer healing: a proposal.
Brown GS
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 12669674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
