These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18386546)

  • 21. Cement penetration in the proximal femur does not depend on broach surface finish.
    Breusch SJ; Norman TL; Revie IC; Lehner B; Caillouette JT; Schneider U; Blaha JD; Lukoschek M
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 11327410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A modified technique for the fixation of pathologic fractures in the lower femur.
    Varriale PL; Evans PE; Sallis JG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Oct; (199):256-60. PubMed ID: 4042488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic bone preparation does not increase cement penetration into the proximal femur: a matched-pair cadaver study comparing hand-broaching versus robotic bone preparation.
    Aldinger PR; Schneider M; Pritsch M; Kreutzer J; Becker CR; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Jun; 74(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 12899546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical evaluation of bone-cement augmented Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades in a polyurethane foam model with low density.
    Sermon A; Boner V; Schwieger K; Boger A; Boonen S; Broos P; Richards G; Windolf M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21824697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Femoral cementing techniques: current trends in the UK.
    Nedungayil SK; Mehendele S; Gheduzzi S; Learmonth ID
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Mar; 88(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 16551398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Augmentation of femoral neck fracture fixation with an injectable calcium-phosphate bone mineral cement.
    Stankewich CJ; Swiontkowski MF; Tencer AF; Yetkinler DN; Poser RD
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):786-93. PubMed ID: 8893773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing.
    Beckmann J; Goldapp C; Ringleff K; Schaumburger J; Grifka J; Perlick L
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1317-25. PubMed ID: 18802712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CT analysis of defects of the cement mantle and alignment of the stem: in vitro comparison of Charnley-Kerboul femoral hip implants inserted line-to-line and undersized in paired femora.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16365114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Quality of tibial cementing in total knee arthroplasty: one or two phase cementing of the tibial and femoral implants].
    Pujol N; Verdot FX; Chambat P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18456058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in-vitro investigation of the CPS-Plus femoral stem: influence of the proximal centraliser on cement pressurisation during stem insertion.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12807321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques.
    Katz RP; Callaghan JJ; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):178-83. PubMed ID: 7554628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Femoral fissure after cement restrictor implantation].
    Schneider M; Heisel C; Breusch SJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):554-6. PubMed ID: 14551842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany--an update].
    Kreutzer J; Schneider M; Schlegel U; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15754232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Loosening of the femoral component of total hip replacement after plugging the femoral canal.
    Harris WH; McCarthy JC; O'Neill DA
    Hip; 1982; ():228-38. PubMed ID: 7166501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cement restrictor function below the femoral isthmus.
    Moran M; Heisel C; Rupp R; Simpson AH; Breusch SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():111-6. PubMed ID: 17206103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiographic and pathological stages of the changes at the bone-cement interface: an in-vivo experimental study.
    Aksu N; Seyahi A; Aksu T; Oztürk C; Dervişoğlu S; Murat Hiz VM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1187-91. PubMed ID: 18560854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage].
    Wirtz D; Sellei RM; Portheine F; Prescher A; Weber M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2001; 139(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 11605292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel technique for femoral canal occlusion during cement pressurization in proximal femoral arthroplasty.
    Holt G; Panousis K; Mohammed A; Patil S; Meek RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jan; 27(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 22152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.