These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18386768)

  • 1. Caveats in the interpretation of the surgical literature.
    Guller U
    Br J Surg; 2008 May; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18386768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting statistics in the urological literature.
    Scales CD; Peterson B; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):1938-45. PubMed ID: 17070214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting study designs in surgical research: a practical guide for surgeons and surgical residents.
    Ridgway PF; Guller U
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):635-45. PubMed ID: 19476801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reading, writing, and arithmetic of the medical literature, part 3: critical appraisal of primary research.
    Mansfield L
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Jan; 96(1):7-15; quiz 15-6, 44. PubMed ID: 16440526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misuses of correlation and regression analyses in orthodontic research: the problem of mathematical coupling.
    Tu YK; Nelson-Moon ZL; Gilthorpe MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 16849074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment and control of confounding in trauma research.
    Kurth T; Sonis J
    J Trauma Stress; 2007 Oct; 20(5):807-20. PubMed ID: 17955531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting statistics in medical literature: a vade mecum for surgeons.
    Guller U; DeLong ER
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Mar; 198(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 14992748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in the quality of highly cited surgical research over the past 20 years.
    Brooke BS; Nathan H; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jan; 249(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 19106693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based practice in nephrology: critical appraisal of nephrology clinical research: were the correct statistical tests used?
    Podoll AS; Bell CS; Molony DA
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2012 Jan; 19(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 22364798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clarity clinic for surgical writing.
    Derish P; Eastwood S
    J Surg Res; 2008 Jun; 147(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 17655864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation and use of statistics in nursing research.
    Giuliano KK; Polanowicz M
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2008; 19(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 18560290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding statistical analysis in the surgical literature: some key concepts.
    Young J
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 May; 79(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 19566528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistics in biomedical laboratory and clinical science: applications, issues and pitfalls.
    Ludbrook J
    Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 18059094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comments on methodological problems related to the use of biomarkers in clinical practice and research].
    Longrois D; Agavriloaia M; Devaux Y; Mertes PM
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 May; 28(5):473-81. PubMed ID: 19410420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to make your article more acceptable for the statistical reviewer.
    Herbison P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 17279559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective written communication in biomedical sciences.
    Rugh KS; Hahn AW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1996; 32():285-91. PubMed ID: 8672681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding confounding and mediation.
    Babyak MA
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2009 Aug; 12(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 19633239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of propensity scores should be discouraged when there is too little and too early of new surgical techniques.
    Shuhaiber JH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):713-4; author reply 714. PubMed ID: 18329509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.