These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1838700)

  • 21. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case-control study.
    Cuzick J; Warwick J; Pinney E; Duffy SW; Cawthorn S; Howell A; Forbes JF; Warren RM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 May; 103(9):744-52. PubMed ID: 21483019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?
    Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J; Creasman J; Tice JA; Ziv E; Cummings SR
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 15741573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer.
    Saftlas AF; Hoover RN; Brinton LA; Szklo M; Olson DR; Salane M; Wolfe JN
    Cancer; 1991 Jun; 67(11):2833-8. PubMed ID: 2025849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
    Chiarelli AM; Kirsh VA; Klar NS; Shumak R; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1856-62. PubMed ID: 17035392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
    Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
    Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer: knowledge and views of those at risk.
    Tyndel S; Clements A; Bankhead C; Henderson BJ; Brain K; Watson E; Austoker J;
    Br J Cancer; 2008 Oct; 99(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 18827822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer.
    Ma H; Luo J; Press MF; Wang Y; Bernstein L; Ursin G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Feb; 18(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 19190139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
    Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Harms of Restrictive Risk-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.
    Neal CH; Rahman WT; Joe AI; Noroozian M; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):228-234. PubMed ID: 29091007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
    Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women.
    Ko H; Shin J; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Nguyen TL; Hopper JL; Song YM
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):821. PubMed ID: 29207971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.