299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18387385)
1. Staging saturation biopsy in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol.
Abouassaly R; Lane BR; Jones JS
Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):573-7. PubMed ID: 18387385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort.
Dall'Era MA; Konety BR; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Stauf F; Cooperberg MR; Meng MV; Kane CJ; Perez N; Master VA; Carroll PR
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(12):2664-70. PubMed ID: 18433013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.
Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience.
Soloway MS; Soloway CT; Williams S; Ayyathurai R; Kava B; Manoharan M
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17850361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer death of men treated with initial active surveillance: clinical and biochemical characteristics.
Krakowsky Y; Loblaw A; Klotz L
J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20478589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of repeated biopsy of the prostate in predicting disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Al Otaibi M; Ross P; Fahmy N; Jeyaganth S; Trottier H; Sircar K; Bégin LR; Souhami L; Kassouf W; Aprikian A; Tanguay S
Cancer; 2008 Jul; 113(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 18484590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.
Barocas DA; Cowan JE; Smith JA; Carroll PR;
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. PubMed ID: 18707731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes?
Thong AE; Shikanov S; Katz MH; Gofrit ON; Eggener S; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40. PubMed ID: 18930486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate-specific antigen velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer.
Venkitaraman R; Norman A; Woode-Amissah R; Dearnaley D; Horwich A; Huddart R; Parker C
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 17850368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancer.
Klotz L
Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 16414494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of immediate confirmatory prostate biopsy to ensure accurate eligibility for active surveillance.
Motamedinia P; RiChard JL; McKiernan JM; DeCastro GJ; Benson MC
Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1070-4. PubMed ID: 23107398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting unilateral prostate cancer based on biopsy features: implications for focal ablative therapy--results from the SEARCH database.
Scales CD; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17698131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.
Choo R; Klotz L; Danjoux C; Morton GC; DeBoer G; Szumacher E; Fleshner N; Bunting P; Hruby G
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1664-9. PubMed ID: 11912384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate saturation biopsy in the reevaluation of microfocal prostate cancer.
Boccon-Gibod LM; de Longchamps NB; Toublanc M; Boccon-Gibod LA; Ravery V
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):961-3; discussion 963-4. PubMed ID: 16890668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy.
Lane BR; Zippe CD; Abouassaly R; Schoenfield L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1746-50; discussion 1750. PubMed ID: 18343412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy.
Sartor AO; Hricak H; Wheeler TM; Coleman J; Penson DF; Carroll PR; Rubin MA; Scardino PT
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6 Suppl):S12-24. PubMed ID: 19095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
