BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18387932)

  • 1. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer.
    Acharya CR; Hsu DS; Anders CK; Anguiano A; Salter KH; Walters KS; Redman RC; Tuchman SA; Moylan CA; Mukherjee S; Barry WT; Dressman HK; Ginsburg GS; Marcom KP; Garman KS; Lyman GH; Nevins JR; Potti A
    JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(13):1574-87. PubMed ID: 18387932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age- and sex-specific genomic profiles in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Mostertz W; Stevenson M; Acharya C; Chan I; Walters K; Lamlertthon W; Barry W; Crawford J; Nevins J; Potti A
    JAMA; 2010 Feb; 303(6):535-43. PubMed ID: 20145230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nomogram integrating gene expression signatures with clinicopathological features to predict survival in operable NSCLC: a pooled analysis of 2164 patients.
    Wu J; Zhou L; Huang L; Gu J; Li S; Liu B; Feng J; Zhou Y
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 36(1):4. PubMed ID: 28057025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification and Construction of Combinatory Cancer Hallmark-Based Gene Signature Sets to Predict Recurrence and Chemotherapy Benefit in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.
    Gao S; Tibiche C; Zou J; Zaman N; Trifiro M; O'Connor-McCourt M; Wang E
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jan; 2(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 26502222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic predictor of residual risk of recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in high risk estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.
    Khan SS; Karn T; Symmans WF; Rody A; Müller V; Holtrich U; Becker S; Pusztai L; Hatzis C
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 149(3):789-97. PubMed ID: 25651779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-based molecular prognosis of breast cancer by transcriptional profiling.
    Ma Y; Qian Y; Wei L; Abraham J; Shi X; Castranova V; Harner EJ; Flynn DC; Guo L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(7):2014-22. PubMed ID: 17404081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A candidate molecular signature associated with tamoxifen failure in primary breast cancer.
    Vendrell JA; Robertson KE; Ravel P; Bray SE; Bajard A; Purdie CA; Nguyen C; Hadad SM; Bieche I; Chabaud S; Bachelot T; Thompson AM; Cohen PA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(5):R88. PubMed ID: 18928543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER).
    Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; van Harten WH; Retel VP; van 't Veer LJ; van Dam FS; Karsenberg K; Douma KF; van Tinteren H; Peterse JL; Wesseling J; Wu TS; Atsma D; Rutgers EJ; Brink G; Floore AN; Glas AM; Roumen RM; Bellot FE; van Krimpen C; Rodenhuis S; van de Vijver MJ; Linn SC
    Lancet Oncol; 2007 Dec; 8(12):1079-1087. PubMed ID: 18042430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 38-gene expression signature to predict metastasis risk in node-positive breast cancer after systemic adjuvant chemotherapy: a genomic substudy of PACS01 clinical trial.
    Jézéquel P; Campone M; Roché H; Gouraud W; Charbonnel C; Ricolleau G; Magrangeas F; Minvielle S; Genève J; Martin AL; Bataille R; Campion L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 116(3):509-20. PubMed ID: 19020972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrated gene expression profile predicts prognosis of breast cancer patients.
    Li LF; Xu XJ; Zhao Y; Liu ZB; Shen ZZ; Jin WR; Shao ZM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jan; 113(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 18278552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive value of CD44 and CD24 for prognosis and chemotherapy response in invasive breast ductal carcinoma.
    Chen Y; Song J; Jiang Y; Yu C; Ma Z
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(9):11287-95. PubMed ID: 26617852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High GINS2 transcript level predicts poor prognosis and correlates with high histological grade and endocrine therapy resistance through mammary cancer stem cells in breast cancer patients.
    Zheng M; Zhou Y; Yang X; Tang J; Wei D; Zhang Y; Jiang JL; Chen ZN; Zhu P
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Nov; 148(2):423-36. PubMed ID: 25348432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gene expression profile predicts outcome after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.
    Bertucci F; Borie N; Roche H; Bachelot T; Le Doussal JM; Macgrogan G; Debono S; Martinec A; Treilleux I; Finetti P; Esterni B; Extra JM; Geneve J; Hermitte F; Chabannon C; Jacquemier J; Martin AL; Longy M; Maraninchi D; Fert V; Birnbaum D; Viens P
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 127(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 20585850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A gene expression signature that can predict the recurrence of tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancer.
    Chanrion M; Negre V; Fontaine H; Salvetat N; Bibeau F; Mac Grogan G; Mauriac L; Katsaros D; Molina F; Theillet C; Darbon JM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 14(6):1744-52. PubMed ID: 18347175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of gene expression profiles predicting progression in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen.
    Kok M; Linn SC; Van Laar RK; Jansen MP; van den Berg TM; Delahaye LJ; Glas AM; Peterse JL; Hauptmann M; Foekens JA; Klijn JG; Wessels LF; Van't Veer LJ; Berns EM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jan; 113(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 18311582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene expression profiles of tumor biology provide a novel approach to prognosis and may guide the selection of therapeutic targets in multiple myeloma.
    Anguiano A; Tuchman SA; Acharya C; Salter K; Gasparetto C; Zhan F; Dhodapkar M; Nevins J; Barlogie B; Shaughnessy JD; Potti A
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 27(25):4197-203. PubMed ID: 19636021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-specific differences in oncogenic pathway deregulation seen in human breast tumors.
    Anders CK; Acharya CR; Hsu DS; Broadwater G; Garman K; Foekens JA; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Marcom K; Marks JR; Mukherjee S; Nevins JR; Blackwell KL; Potti A
    PLoS One; 2008 Jan; 3(1):e1373. PubMed ID: 18167534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Genomic Grade Assay Compared With Ki67 to Determine Risk of Distant Breast Cancer Recurrence.
    Ignatiadis M; Azim HA; Desmedt C; Veys I; Larsimont D; Salgado R; Lyng MB; Viale G; Leyland-Jones B; Giobbie-Hurder A; Kammler R; Dell'Orto P; Rothé F; Laïos I; Ditzel HJ; Regan MM; Piccart M; Michiels S; Sotiriou C
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26633571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of public cancer datasets and signatures identifies TP53 mutant signatures with robust prognostic and predictive value.
    Lehmann BD; Ding Y; Viox DJ; Jiang M; Zheng Y; Liao W; Chen X; Xiang W; Yi Y
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():179. PubMed ID: 25886164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes on breast cancer specific survival, distant metastases and local relapse rates in conservatively managed early stage breast cancer: a retrospective clinical study.
    Sanpaolo P; Barbieri V; Genovesi D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 37(10):876-82. PubMed ID: 21824742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.