BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18387986)

  • 1. Macroscopic findings at appendicectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix.
    Roberts JK; Behravesh M; Dmitrewski J
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 16(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 18387986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of the Macroscopically Normal Appendix Left in Situ in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis.
    Lee S; Connelly TM; Ryan JM; Power-Foley M; Neary PM
    World J Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(6):1353-1358. PubMed ID: 35274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "What you see is not what you get". A plea to remove a 'normal' appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy.
    Chiarugi M; Buccianti P; Decanini L; Balestri R; Lorenzetti L; Franceschi M; Cavina E
    Acta Chir Belg; 2001; 101(5):243-5. PubMed ID: 11758109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis in children: May a macroscopically normal appendix be left in situ?
    Dingemann J; Metzelder M; Kuebler JF; Ure B
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Jun; 19(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 19347808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found?
    Phillips AW; Jones AE; Sargen K
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2009 Oct; 19(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 19851267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correlation between gross appearance of the appendix at appendicectomy and histological examination.
    Jones MW; Paterson AG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1988 Mar; 70(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 3408167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of useless appendectomies?].
    Barrat C; Champault G; Catheline JM; Rizk N; Ziol M; Guettier C
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(10):965-9. PubMed ID: 9951095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of unnecessary appendicectomies?
    Barrat C; Catheline JM; Rizk N; Champault GG
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1999 Jan; 9(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9950123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should the 'normal' appendix be removed at operation for appendicitis?
    Grunewald B; Keating J
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1993 Jun; 38(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 7687678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The selective use of fine catheter peritoneal cytology and laparoscopy reduces the unnecessary appendicectomy rate.
    Baigrie RJ; Scott-Coombes D; Saidan Z; Vipond MN; Paterson-Brown S; Thompson JN
    Br J Clin Pract; 1992; 46(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1286016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chronic right lower quadrant abdominal pain: laparoscopic approach.
    Thanapongsathron W; Kanjanabut B; Vaniyapong T; Thaworncharoen S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Jun; 88 Suppl 1():S42-7. PubMed ID: 16862668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical significance of routine histopathologic study of the resected appendix and safety of appendiceal inversion.
    Lau WY; Fan ST; Yiu TF; Chu KW; Suen HC; Wong KK
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Mar; 162(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 3952618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of inflammation of the appendix at open and laparoscopic appendicectomy: findings and consequences.
    Al-Ghnaniem R; Kocher HM; Patel AG
    Eur J Surg; 2002; 168(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12022370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens.
    Jones AE; Phillips AW; Jarvis JR; Sargen K
    BMC Surg; 2007 Aug; 7():17. PubMed ID: 17692116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study.
    Nana AM; Ouandji CN; Simoens C; Smets D; Mendes da Costa P
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 54(76):1146-52. PubMed ID: 17629058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interval appendicectomy: a retrospective study.
    Eriksson S; Styrud J
    Eur J Surg; 1998 Oct; 164(10):771-4; discussion 775. PubMed ID: 9840307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Acute appendicitis with goblet cell carcinoid].
    Koopmans NG; Kwee HW; Heemskerk J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1154. PubMed ID: 20619032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: new insight for future trials.
    Gomes CA; Nunes TA; Fonseca Chebli JM; Junior CS; Gomes CC
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Oct; 22(5):463-6. PubMed ID: 23047394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of the acute appendix mass: a survey of surgical practice.
    Irfan M; Hogan AM; Gately R; Lowery AJ; Waldron R; Khan W; Barry K
    Ir Med J; 2012 Oct; 105(9):303-5. PubMed ID: 23240283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An individualized approach to appendectomy in children based on anatomico-laparoscopic findings.
    Gauderer MW
    Am Surg; 2007 Aug; 73(8):814-7. PubMed ID: 17879692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.