These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18388175)
1. Dosemeter readings and effective dose to the cardiologist with protective clothing in a simulated interventional procedure. Schultz FW; Zoetelief J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):311-5. PubMed ID: 18388175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology. Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):460-8. PubMed ID: 17151067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters. Schultz FW; Zoetelief J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16517567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-dosimetry algorithm for workers in interventional radiology. Clerinx P; Buls N; Bosmans H; de Mey J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18426849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical staff monitoring in interventional cardiology: over apron dosemeter placement based on measurements and simulations. Ferrari P; Venturi G; Campani L; Mariotti F; Becker F; Jansen J; Jovanović Z; Krstić D; Teles P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(8):802-807. PubMed ID: 38773775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology: simulations. Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):36-8. PubMed ID: 18283062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of staff lens doses during interventional procedures. Comparing cardiology, neuroradiology and interventional radiology. Vano E; Sanchez RM; Fernandez JM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):279-83. PubMed ID: 25848117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology. Ginjaume M; Carinou E; Brodecki M; Clairand I; Domienik-Andrzejewska J; Exner L; Ferrari P; Jovanović Z; Krstic D; Principi S; Van Hoey O; Vanhavere F J Radiol Prot; 2019 Mar; 39(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 30523896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occupational exposure doses in interventional procedures in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bašić B; Beganović A; Skopljak-Beganović A; Samek D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):501-4. PubMed ID: 21138927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PERFORMANCE OF THE INSTADOSETM DOSEMETER FOR INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY AND CARDIOLOGY APPLICATION. Garzón WJ; Khoury H; Ovalle SAM; Medeiros RB Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 30272212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation exposure of an anaesthesiologist in catheterisation and electrophysiological cardiac procedures. Andreoli S; Moretti R; Lorini FL; Lagrotta M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 25752757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological approach to developing of double dosimetry algorithms and its application in the interventional cardiology. Morgun AA; Chumak VV; Bakhanova OV; Voloskii VM; Furkalo SM; Vlasenko OA; Gyndych PA; Borodinchyk OG; Deniachenko NP Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2013; (18):127-32. PubMed ID: 25191717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations. Schultz FW; Geleijns J; Spoelstra FM; Zoetelief J Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):638-47. PubMed ID: 14500279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A REVIEW OF TWO METHODS USED IN THE USA TO ASSESS HE DURING FLUOROSCOPIC-BASED RADIOLOGY. Yoder RC; Salasky MR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):307-10. PubMed ID: 26891788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Protection against ionizing radiation by leaded glass googles during interventional cardiology]. Zett-Lobos C; Vera-Muñoz F; Arriola-Alvarez K; Díaz-Ramos O; Gamarra J; Fernández-Palomo C; Merello L; Mora AD; Gutierrez A; Catalán-Reyes M; Ramos-Avasola S Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jan; 141(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23732416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information. Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist. Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review. Carinou E; Ferrari P; Bjelac OC; Gingaume M; Merce MS; O'Connor U J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):R17-34. PubMed ID: 26343787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Durán A; Hian SK; Miller DL; Le Heron J; Padovani R; Vano E Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 23475846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]