317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18389414)
1. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Smits C; Houtgast T
Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3236-45. PubMed ID: 20000937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
Cameron S; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.
Zekveld AA; George EL; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Houtgast T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17538101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
